Laserfiche WebLink
addiction to a controlled substance or alcohol or drug abuse that threatens the property or safety <br />of others" (H.R.S. § 515-2; see also 42 U.S.C. § 3602(h)). Here, the maintenance would be a <br />service in connection with the real estate transaction. There is no indication of a safety issue or <br />"direct threat" here (See 42 USC § 3604(f)(9)). <br />Scenario 7. Lilly is a property manager for housing subsidized through the federal low-income <br />housing tax credit (LIHTC). She refuses the reasonable accommodation to build a wheelchair <br />ramp to the first floor rental apartment of a tenant with a disability. Lilly was told by her other <br />tenants that they would not like how it looks. <br />Is this a fair housing violation... How frequently do you think this occurs... <br />Don't Know Unlikely Likely Never Rarely Occasionally Regularly <br />12.9% 6.5% 80.6% 0.0% 36.7% 46.7% 16.7% <br />Correct Answer: Yes, it is likely that this scenario represents illegal discrimination. <br />Legal Explanation: It is discrimination "To refuse to permit, at the expense of a person with a <br />disability, reasonable modifications to existing premises occupied or to be occupied by the <br />person if modifications may be necessary to afford the person full enjoyment of the premises; <br />provided that a real estate broker or salesperson, where it is reasonable to do so, may condition <br />permission for a modification on the person agreeing to restore the interior of the premises to the <br />condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted." (H.R.S. § 515- <br />3(8)). <br />Scenario 8. Lisa is a landlord of an apartment building. She refuses to renew Bob's lease <br />because other tenants have complained that Bob seems to have a mental illness and damaged <br />some chairs by the pool. <br />Is this a fair housing violation... How frequently do you think this occurs... <br />Don't Know Unlikely Likely Never Rarely Occasionally Regularly <br />32.3% 35.5% 32.3% 0.0% 26.7% 53.3% 20.0% <br />Correct Answer: Yes, it is likely that this scenario represents illegal discrimination. <br />Legal Explanation: It is illegal to discriminate based on disability, including mental health <br />disability (H.R.S. § 515-3; see also 42 U.S.C. § 3604(0(1)). Although, "[n]nothing in this <br />subsection requires that a dwelling be made available to an individual whose tenancy would <br />constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals or whose tenancy would <br />result in substantial physical damage to the property of others," that must be an individual <br />determination not based on stereotypes (42 U.S.C. § 3604(0(9)). There is no information here to <br />show that there is such an issue here, other than neighbors blaming Bob for the damage to some <br />chairs by the pool. <br />18 <br />