Laserfiche WebLink
<br />from stopping the recycling of #1 and #2 plastics, but people have been told the money has <br />already been spent. There needs to be a 10-year program to fund e-waste to get it off the <br />island, as it contaminates the ground, water, and starts fires. The Television and Electronic <br />Recovery Act says a covered entity is any business, government, school, or nonprofit. The act <br />was revised in 2017 to allow the county to create its own program, but not to change a covered <br />entity. Regarding cardboard and glass, glass is already taken care of by another fund, so the <br />county should not fund it. Some of the cardboard waste could be used on the island for mulch <br />and weed-killing rather than being shipped. As we live on an island, the cost of shipping waste <br />is prohibitive. <br /> <br /> Roy Kadota: He is the owner of Mr. K’s. The e-waste problem is here to stay, and it <br />needs to be addressed in the 10-year program, as his staff has explained. Maui County was <br />able to contribute $210,000 toward e-waste, and they did it because they don’t want it in their <br />landfill. There are ways our county can come up with money for it. There should also be a <br />diversion fund to get plastic off the island, as it takes a lot to ship it. There was a fund <br />previously, but former Mayor Kenoi did away with it. His employees have said it all, so he’ll <br />leave it at that. <br /> <br /> Kristine Kubat: She is from Recycle Hawaiʻi and wanted to remind the commissioners <br />about the $400,000 the county saved from the rollback of recycling services provided by <br />Business Services Hawaiʻi. At the last meeting, the commission voted to send a communication <br />to the County Council, saying they supported keeping the money in the recycling budget. That <br />communication has never been sent, and she would like a commitment from the commission <br />that it will be done. After the rollback of the recycling, if the electronic waste recycling gets cut, <br />it will not be pretty, and people might take matters into their own hands. There is also the <br />question of whether it is legal for the director to have reallocated money that is in a line item to <br />something else without authorization or permission from the council. Some people have told <br />her it is not legal and some say it is, so she is requesting clarification from Corporation Counsel <br />on this. Regarding the draft Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan, it has many <br />punctuation, spelling, grammatical, and computational errors. The county is paying for it and <br />deserves a high quality end product. Also, there was a decision made not to do a waste <br />composition study. When she brought this up, the response was that it these studies are not <br />very accurate and it was unnecessary to know everything that is in the waste. This is not true. <br />These studies are done all over and are accurate and important. The plan that is supposed to <br />guide us for the next 10 years is based on a study that was done in 2008, and a portion of it was <br />done in 2001. An up-to-date waste composition study needs to be done. <br /> <br /> Chair Pequeño called up Sandra Demoruelle for her testimony and informed her, for the <br />record, that he had received her written request for information on the Nāālehu and Pāhala ʻ <br />Wastewater Treatment Plants. However, the commission does not have the records or <br />information she is seeking, so her request has been forwarded to the department. <br /> <br /> Sandra Demoruelle: She thanked the commissioners for their service and efforts. She <br />wanted to remind everyone that in October, Chair Bennett began a conversation on changing <br />the public testimony portion of the agenda by adding a statement about what is wanted. She <br />4 <br /> <br />