My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-03-05 Exh B New Cingular dba AT&T USE 19-081
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-03-05 Exh B New Cingular dba AT&T USE 19-081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2020 2:53:50 PM
Creation date
6/4/2020 2:53:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PALEKA-KAMA: Aloha mai kakou. My name is Kaui Paleka-Kama, and I live right on the <br />access road. I'm a lessee of record and did not receive notice. The County Code, Chapter 25, <br />Use Permits require special attention to ensure there are no substantial adverse impacts on the <br />surrounding community, and the special attention in this situation, if they are going to access via <br />where they initially put the sign but then had to put it on an actual public road, old plantation <br />camp roads were initially big paths. And, when the plantation closed and workers got the land, <br />they never create one community association. Big paths belong to the property owners, and <br />everyone does their part in their area to maintain the road in lieu of a road maintenance fee. So, I <br />question the vague reference to a deed of the access road. They may own the road at the access <br />point only in this situation, but no way they own the whole road. <br />So, they need permission from the other owners of the road! And, you going tell by the <br />testifying, they don't have it. The General Plan directs that public utilities, or in this case, the <br />cell tower, shall—not may, shall—complement the adjacent agriculture and residential areas and <br />minimize noise disturbance. I live right at that corner. The acoustics in that area are wonderful. <br />I can hear the `io at night. I can hear even when they are in the pasture just talking. A beautiful <br />place, the scene, everything. <br />So, there is no way they can really minimize the noise impact. That consistent humming going <br />be amplified, and in the General Plan, the one and only, and I don't know if that's good or bad, <br />specific standard for cell towers in the General Plan dictates that the scenic views and vistas <br />again shall be considered and preserved where possible. <br />So, I told you a little bit about the area, the animals, and specialness of the place, and you will <br />hear the other impacts, the adverse impacts on the scenery, on the environment, on the potential <br />health, on the noise, but it has already impacted the community socially. Mr. Umiat has been <br />asking one of the neighborhood boys why everybody upset. So, he might not be aware of all the <br />impacts, and he get right to do what he like on his property, but not at the expense of potentially <br />harming others. <br />So, it doesn't look like it meets the criteria based on the special issue of the community and the <br />GP, and the adverse impacts on the vista, privacy, environment, noise, health, and social impacts. <br />Mahalo for my time. <br />RAFFIPIY: Mahalo. <br />AU: Mr. Chair, I've got a quick question for the testifier. <br />HALL: After. <br />AU: Okay. <br />RAFFIPIY: Let them finish up, please. Thank you. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.