|
granting a Use Permit, the Applicant does not meet the criteria since it is not consistent with the
<br />General Plan. The Applicant also does not meet the criteria since the building of the cell tower
<br />will be detrimental to the community character and surrounding properties.
<br />And, I wanted to talk about the guys that voted for this. We talked to the president, the guy
<br />Larry, who was the president of that committee, and he was so arrogant and everything. We
<br />talked to him. He said, "oh, if you guys would have been just there, we wouldn't have voted that
<br />way" and I said, one of the guys mentioned, "oh, you like `em in your backyard?" And, he went,
<br />"Yeah, put `em in my backyard." And, then he realized, you know, we had about five guys
<br />against one guy, he started talking nice, but that's the kind of guy he is, but there's only two guys
<br />left from that committee. Him and one other guy, and they voted without letting anybody else
<br />know around there. That's why his attitude was like, "If we would have known you guys, we
<br />would have fought it, we wouldn't have voted on it," and I said, "Just the same, why don't you
<br />why didn't you let us know?" And that's all his excuse was that oh they sent letters out to, for
<br />the road, the road maintenance. They sent it to everybody. Why couldn't they send something
<br />about the cell tower to us? We would have known, and we would have gone right there and fight
<br />them, but this was last year. They voted okay without even letting anybody else know. That's
<br />why we upset. Yeah, we upset. Anybody would be upset. Okay, that's about it.
<br />REPLOGLE: Thank you, Fred.
<br />SCHISZLER: Hi, I'm Albert Schiszler, and I just have to take up from where he left off I guess.
<br />It's the president issue. I have the document right here signed by the president and with no
<br />quorum or any other witnesses, witnesses' signatures.
<br />REPLOGLE: Oh, would you please speak into the mic, sir?
<br />SCHISZLER: Yes, I have the president's authorization letter with me, and it has no witness, no
<br />quorum, vote, or anything that looks legit to me, and I'd like—my supporter, Fred, here has
<br />already told you folks that the board is dysfunctional at this moment, and I have a text here from
<br />Councilwoman Kierkiewicz that says in this case, the HPP Homeowners' Association approval
<br />of this project on behalf of the homeowners, when the HPPOA is currently non-functional,
<br />subject of internal lawsuit, and has only met twice in the last two years, could and should be
<br />investigated. It would be important to find out whether they had sufficient community input
<br />and/or authority to make this decision. Now, the Councilwoman agrees with us on this issue,
<br />and I wish you folks would, too. And—it's this issue about the, the playground and the park
<br />seems to be very, very aunbelievable. I know Mr. Morrison [sic] personally. I've known him
<br />for several years, maybe 30, as a matter of fact. I know his whole family, and this is the first
<br />time I've seen him go in the direction he is going by actually lying to somebody about the non-
<br />existent playground. Anybody, and we have a picture that we've submitted to you folks, can see
<br />that there is a structure which probably cost $20,000 in playground equipment, that's very high
<br />and large, and with a surrounding fence and a gate, couple of picnic tables, a few swings, an
<br />outhouse within spitting distance of the cell phone tower location, proposed cell phone tower
<br />location. This is not acceptable. Zero acceptance on this, folks. You have to understand. We
<br />were not notified properly. We need a general membership vote on this, not behind -the -door,
<br />half -ass, board of directors' decision with one president signature. That is walking on thin ice.
<br />EXHIBIT C
<br />17
<br />
|