2020-03-05 Exh C New Cingular dba AT&T USE 19-082

Home

CLARKSON: Well, I'm just scaling, there's a drawing that shows a 175 -foot setback; however, the tower is only a 105 feet high, so just rough scaling puts the playground around a 100 feet from the base of the tower, but without any actual map showing the existing playground and the distances, I can't really be sure. JACKSON: Chair Replogle, may I ask REPLOGLE: Yes JACKSON: Mr. Clarkson a question. Commissioner Clarkson, which image are you looking at in the package that shows the playground? That's in the arch study. Okay let me look at that real quick AU: Page, it's page 6, it's not labeled, but it's page 6. JACKSON: Okay. So, if you look at Sheet A-1 in the Applicant's site plans, ah, I see, okay CLARKSON: In the Applicant's? JACKSON: Yeah, the application has some site plans, and Sheet A-1 shows the tower, the existing community center building, it's right before the notification list, so I think it's more forward—yeah, a few more pages, Dean. Yeah, Sheet A-1 in that area, so that shows the CLARKSON: —Well, I saw the notification list JACKSON: —The tower location and the community center building, and there's a dimension on here. It's hard to read, but it says 208 feet. So, from the center of the tower which is approximately where the red dot is on this image to the corner of this building here is 208 feet, and so the proposed tower height is 105 so the fall radius would be generally, estimating in this location here. AUDIENCE MEMBER: That's the playground. CLARKSON: That's, I understand that, Maija JACKSON: Okay. CLARKSON: But the outline of the playground that's shown on the site plan puts the corner of the playground much closer to the tower than, than the community center. JACKSON: Okay. CLARKSON: And, there's no dimension there to really locate it. SCHISZLER (from audience): They lied that there was no playground to begin with. EXHIBIT C 21