Laserfiche WebLink
noisy environment, so it's actually a very quiet unit encased in these shelters, and they are also <br />mounted with anti -vibration mounting and baffling to keep noise minimized. <br />And, again, in the last hearing, we had questions about the potential health risks which we've <br />discussed before, but for the record, I'll just go through it quickly again. AT&T builds and <br />maintains all their sites in accordance with FCC guidelines for human exposure radiofrequency. <br />The energy from the antennas on sites decreases with distance. As a result, ground level <br />exposure is much lower than if a person were close to the antenna and the main beam, meaning <br />up at 140 feet. The FCC's RF exposure guidelines recommend the maximum permissible <br />exposure level to the general public of approximately 580 microwatts per square meter. This <br />limit is many times greater than the RF levels typically found near the base, base of cell sites or <br />in the vicinity. The proposed site will operate at levels much lower than the FCC limits. In <br />addition, the American Cancer Society affirms that at ground level near typical cellular -based <br />stations, the amount of RF energy is thousands of times less than limits for safe exposure set by <br />the FCC and other regulatory guide authorities. And, it was also found that it's very unlikely for <br />an individual to be exposed to excessive RF just by being close to a cell site. Accordingly, as a <br />report on cell sites, the American Cancer Society confirms that most scientists believe that cell <br />sites and antennas are unlikely to cause cancer or result in health problems. <br />Again, the World Health Organization confirms the same, comes to the same conclusion and <br />reaffirms that—confirms that RF emissions diminish rapidly with distance. And, the State <br />Department of Health, Hazard Evaluation Emergency Response Office, and I included their fact <br />sheet which has recently been published, found that the current body of scientific evidence does <br />not show an association with cell phone use or living near cell towers and cancer. While studies <br />specifically about living near towers are few, RF energy exposure from your personal cell phone <br />is significantly higher than living in the close proximity to a cell tower, and large studies do not <br />show an association of heavy cell phone usage and cancer. So, additional information about RF <br />safety is included in your package. <br />Again, we had questions about property values, and I'll keep this short, but there aren't definitive <br />studies showing that property values are decreasing across the country, and I've referenced a <br />number of studies here that, that confirm this. <br />And, lastly, I again wanted to reiterate this is a part of the FirstNet program, which is the <br />backbone, as we discussed for, for the FirstNet program here locally in Hawaii. This will be a <br />node in it, and we've gotten letters in support from the County of Hawaii Fire Department and <br />the Police Department. Just to point out, the Fire Department is a vested recipient, this is a quote <br />from the Chief, the Fire Chief that "HCFD is a vested recipient of the build out FirstNet, a <br />broadband network dedicated to public safety. The fact that Hawai` i is the first to roll this out <br />speaks volumes to the readiness of AT&T to provide the service to Hawaii Island. FirstNet <br />allows our department priority and preemption while on FirstNet, thereby securing optimum <br />emergency response by increasing optimum communication among our first responders. <br />However, the efficient use of cellular technology such as FirstNet is subject to effective cellular <br />coverage. Unfortunately, cellular coverage on Hawaii Island is not optimum, leaving critical <br />catchment areas void of effective service." This is one of those areas that we need to cover. <br />This is a priority also. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />3 <br />