My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh A (REZ 19-236)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh A (REZ 19-236)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2020 5:39:46 PM
Creation date
6/18/2020 5:39:28 PM
Metadata
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HALL: We need a second first. <br /> CARR SMITH: Is there a second to that motion? <br /> KEALOHA: I'll second. <br /> CARR SMITH: Motion by Mr. Newberg and second by Mr. Kealoha. Discussion? <br /> VAN PERNIS: Yes, I'd like to move to amend the motion to include a condition that the public <br /> trail be, remain available to the public despite the passage of this, of the motion. <br /> UNGER: So we have a motion on the table to approve as recommended and a second, so I guess <br /> we should discuss that first, and part of that discussion can include Mr. Van Pernis's suggestion? <br /> Is that, is that something we can move forward on? <br /> CARR SMITH: Yes, thank you. Discussion? <br /> UNGER: I'll probably vote in favor of the recommendation as it is, and the record will note that <br /> we are talking about the public trail, and I would like to pass this up to the County Council for <br /> their final decision. We are a recommending body on this, as we know, and I'm okay with just <br /> letting the record show that there is a public trail issue and let them have that discussion at that <br /> point. And I'm okay with moving it forward. So I will be voting yea on the motion. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, I feel like it's in an unusual situation where, you know, we, I don't feel like <br /> we can make a commitment on this parcel to keep the public trail open over private land when <br /> the parcel makai could shut it off at any time for any reason. I think that a more permanent <br /> solution needs to happen with access off of the road up above into the forest reserve. And so I <br /> would be happy to go along with the motion as recommended. <br /> KEALOHA: I support it as well. There is a public access point on the next street above. It <br /> actually provides signage from the DLNR. I use both trails to be frank, and, but there is a public <br /> access point, so for that reason, I don't know that it would be fair to obligate this owner to serve <br /> that purpose. <br /> CARR SMITH: I also support the motion, especially based on what Mr. Kealoha just said; very <br /> likely the trail may just be a trespassing trail, so. Any other comments? [None.] Can we please <br /> vote on the motion? <br /> KAY: Yes, thank you, Madam Chair. I just want to clarify; the Director's recommendation is <br /> again to delete the condition around the archaeological study and then re-letter. Mr. Newberg, <br /> that was your understanding with your motion? <br /> NEWBERG: Correct. <br /> KAY: Okay, thank you. All right. Commissioner Newberg? <br /> 6 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.