My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh D (AMEND REZ 2004-024 & AMEND REZ 2004-025)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh D (AMEND REZ 2004-024 & AMEND REZ 2004-025)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2020 5:45:00 PM
Creation date
6/18/2020 5:44:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VAN PERNIS: Can you answer that question? <br /> FUKE: The specific answer is no, I don't know how many new homes were constructed in that <br /> area, no, sir. <br /> CARR SMITH: Mr. Van Pernis, are you asking that as it relates to traffic or what, what's the <br /> relativity here? <br /> VAN PERNIS: I'm asking a question regarding traffic in that area. Are you still proposing 500 <br /> stalls, as the staff indicated, for the commercial area? <br /> FUKE: Well, the commercial, the number of parking stalls is directly tied into what the Zoning <br /> Code says; the Zoning Code says if you have a retail area, then the minimum parking <br /> requirement is 1 stall for every 300 square feet. And if you are going to <br /> VAN PERNIS: What was the staff said, the original construction of commercial area included <br /> 500 parking stalls. The staff then said the amount of commercial area was reduced but did not <br /> say whether the number of parking stalls was reduced. Do you know whether it was reduced or <br /> not? <br /> FUKE: Logic would say that the parking would be, the parking would be reduced, because if <br /> you are reducing it by 20,000 square feet, then, you know, mathematically there should have <br /> been a reduction by 20,000 divided by 300. I don't know what the number is. <br /> VAN PERNIS: So the <br /> CARR SMITH: I believe that would be addressed to the planning level as well, not at this <br /> rezoning. <br /> HALL: Sixty-six less stalls. <br /> CARR SMITH: Sorry? <br /> HALL: Sixty-six less stalls. <br /> CARR SMITH: Sixty-six less stalls. <br /> HALL: If my math is right. <br /> VAN PERNIS: May I ask the developer? Excuse me, sir, did you say you had worked with this <br /> group before? <br /> VAN BERGEN: Yes. <br /> VAN PERNIS: And what group was that? <br /> 25 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.