|
F. STONE: Because that's the way it is in order. Oh, I did have one quick question: Since Sorin
<br /> from John Mauck and Associates can't be here, will I be able to get a transcript to give him, our
<br /> attorney?
<br /> DARROW: Once it's available.
<br /> F. STONE: What's that?
<br /> DARROW: Once it's available.
<br /> F. STONE: Okay, that's fine. All right. So, I actually wanted to start with just some of the
<br /> background information because that will kind of help clarify things. So in the, your big packet,
<br /> just on the second page, if you just flip from the first page, it says, "Ashram Meditation Practice
<br /> three nights a week"; Monday is meditation, Thursday there is a small philosophy class, and
<br /> Friday evenings is actually movie night, we just get together and watch movie together, not
<br /> members can come or not. And in addition, we did talk with the neighbors about the three
<br /> weekly drop-in yoga classes in the morning. And if, we had offered that if traffic is a huge
<br /> concern, we would be willing to drop those. If we go
<br /> CARR SMITH: Can you, do you mind referring to a Condition number when you are
<br /> F. STONE: I'm not on the conditions yet. I'm just going over just a couple of general things.
<br /> CARR SMITH: Okay, very good, thanks.
<br /> F. STONE: Okay, the "Reason for the Request," it says that yoga ashrams are not permitted uses
<br /> in the State Land Use, but actually church is permitted in State Land, in Ag land in the State.
<br /> Then we can skip ahead to, oh, on Condition, on the No. 8 where it says about, "the permitted
<br /> dwelling on the property appears to have unpermitted additions attached,"that's not the case.
<br /> We, and, we just repurposed one pod to become a meditation room and additional bedrooms.
<br /> And we did apply for those after the fact to be done.
<br /> All right, now, if we go to the SMA, which I believe is No. 6—let's see—we really don't have
<br /> much there except that for the Judd Trail, on Page 5, it says that Nahona Partners paid for the
<br /> Judd Trail easements or they were supposed to pay for that, but if you turn to Page 15,there we
<br /> were talking with the State because Nahona Partners went out of business and nothing was being,
<br /> no progress was being made in the subdivision. We stepped forward and said we'll pay for all
<br /> eight easements and we'll also pay for the appraisal to be done for what that would cost, and we
<br /> did, and that was 2,800 dollars that we paid on January 11, 2005,to get those eight easements,
<br /> which if you flip forward, it talks about that again on Page 17
<br /> DARROW: Where are you at, ma'am?
<br /> 12
<br /> EXHIBIT E
<br />
|