My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh E (SMA 19-074 & SPP 19-210)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh E (SMA 19-074 & SPP 19-210)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2020 5:47:34 PM
Creation date
6/18/2020 5:46:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KAY: You know, I apologize, there is one condition that says the applicant, its successor or <br /> assigns shall comply with all conditions of the Special Permit; I believe that that's why I put it in <br /> there. It may be superfluous at this point, and we can strike it out since there is nothing on this <br /> one that's timed. But the same rationale and thought process goes for the Special Permit. <br /> CARR SMITH: So I think what they were asking is if there will be a time extension or time <br /> frame that has to do with the easement over the Judd Trail. <br /> KAY: So because there is, there is no performance condition that's put in there, that's between <br /> the applicant and the State relative to the Judd Trail. We have no idea how long that's going to <br /> take. According to Land Division, it can take a year or longer, but that's something that is <br /> between, was between Nahona Partners and the State, but is now, according to the Board of Land <br /> and Natural Resources easement sale document, now any successors or assigns would be <br /> required to comply with that. And so that's the hold-off I think with those Judd Trail easements, <br /> is that SHPD is still determining what those preservation requirements are going to be, and the <br /> applicant would need to comply with those before they can have legal access across the Judd <br /> Trail. <br /> CARR SMITH: Does that make sense? <br /> F. STONE: So it tells me that the easement is not, we are, we are not given any conditions, <br /> that's great. <br /> CARR SMITH: Because I think the County sees your access through the subdivision, right? <br /> F. STONE: Both. We still see it as both, but we'll address that in a minute. <br /> VITOUSEK: Going back to the flood <br /> F. STONE: Yes. <br /> VITOUSEK: issue. So, hearing that, you know, there is something coming from the County <br /> DPW Engineering that any as-built structures within the area need to comply with the Chapter <br /> 27, do those structures comply with Chapter 27? <br /> F. STONE: On what we show is that the tributary, which is also on your map here, it's straight <br /> under the original permitted building, and we did comply with everything. <br /> VITOUSEK: So theI guess the question for both the unpermitted yoga deck, does that <br /> comply, as far as anybody knows, with the standard <br /> F. STONE: We think it does because it's not near there. <br /> KAY: Based on our conversations with Building Division, they would need to come in for an <br /> as-built permit, and those <br /> 18 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.