My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh E (SMA 19-074 & SPP 19-210)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh E (SMA 19-074 & SPP 19-210)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2020 5:47:34 PM
Creation date
6/18/2020 5:46:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
determination for the Special Management Area Permit, again, given that the project is likely to <br /> exceed the 500,000-dollar threshold. <br /> Kona CDP designates the area within the Kona Urban Area. You can kind of see the small red <br /> line here and further mauka encompasses the Kona Urban Area. <br /> Here's two aerial photographs of the subject parcel: On the upper left just showing the subject <br /> property bounded in purple and the adjacent residential subdivisions and agricultural <br /> subdivisions, so you can see single-family residential uses here, as well as farm dwelling uses <br /> and some farm uses in the Ho`omalu Subdivision; on the lower right we've got a blown-up <br /> picture of the subject property, again, bounded in purple, access coming from Kona Sea View, <br /> pardon me, Sea View Circle, as well as you can see Ho`omaluhia Drive here. The driveway <br /> access is across, from Ho`omaluhia Drive across the Judd Trail is generally in this area. On the <br /> subject property you'll see the existing dwelling, and this is the unpermitted yoga deck here <br /> attached to the existing dwelling. We've got an additional farm dwelling that was built without a <br /> permit here. The applicant is in the process of demolishing that. We are requesting a demolition <br /> permit to take that out. There were four other unpermitted structures up along the backside of <br /> the property here, two bungalows for lack of a better term and then two tent decks where covered <br /> and, tents were erected for retreat participants. Also, we've got the barn here that we talked <br /> about earlier. The property does have some agricultural use on it in a form of fruit trees and the <br /> trees for trading religious prayer beads. <br /> Here is the applicant's site plan. Again, this is kind of flipped a little bit, but we've got Sea <br /> View Circle here coming to the top of the property and Ho`omaluhia Drive here. You can see <br /> the Judd Trail indicated here in the dash line. And we've got the entering way for the driveway <br /> here across the area, again, showing the existing dwelling that is being proposed for the <br /> residential yoga ashram, the unpermitted yoga deck connected, and the additional farm dwelling <br /> that is in the process of being removed. Sorry, I failed to mention on the other one that there is <br /> also a shrine gazebo here in this area, and you can see driveway and parking area here. Adjacent <br /> to the right of the existing dwelling is the proposed location of the new ashram temple facility <br /> and, again, some, you know, showing trees and landscaping as well. <br /> I should mention, you know,there was question about legal access over the Judd Trail <br /> throughout the process. We've got a comment letter from the Department of Land and Natural <br /> Resources, Land Division, indicating that there was no record that there was ever an access <br /> easement that was executed across the Judd Trail in this area. Upon further research, we found <br /> that that was based on a requirement within the Board of Land and Natural Resources sale of <br /> eight access easements across the Judd Trail, which indicated that there was a requirement that <br /> the applicant at the time, Nahona Partners, or any successors or assigns, be responsible for <br /> complying with preservation measures that would be required by SHPD. As after the first phase <br /> of the subdivision was granted, unfortunately Nahona Partners dissolved as a business, and we <br /> were unable to follow through with those easements. And, as it currently stands, SHPD is <br /> determining what those preservation requirements will be. Also, as part of this, we researched <br /> the access along Ho`omaluhia Drive and found that unfortunately again there was no access <br /> easement that was approved for the applicant across Ho`omaluhia Drive. <br /> 4 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.