|
RAFFIPIY: Mr. Darrow, go ahead.
<br /> DARROW: Just going forward, so we do have the reasons, we have some conditions that are
<br /> being proposed. I know that the Applicant may have a concern regarding some of those
<br /> conditions. One of them may be the single driveway access. There might be a requirement by
<br /> Fire to have possibly a, you know,two, I'm not sure, but it might be good to just going forward
<br /> to see if those are actually able to be complied with. And, it might be good if you're okay
<br /> with—Commissioner Clarkson, if staff could possibly ask that other conditions may be added
<br /> that are normal conditions of approval that we add in. Usually, there's a time condition. There's
<br /> applicability to all County, State, Federal laws, rules, codes,those kinds of things, and maybe
<br /> any other, so that the conditions of approval are more complete. That's just a thought going
<br /> forward. Thank you.
<br /> CLARKSON: Yes, I would agree with that. You know, there's usually a whole list of
<br /> conditions that go with any approval in addition to the specific ones that I brought up. As far as
<br /> the compliance with Fire Department regulations, it can be checked out, but I'm pretty sure that
<br /> if the turning radius is at the "T" off of the driveway back to the rear house are adequate, that a
<br /> and there's a turnaround at the buildingI don't even think there will have to be a turnaround at
<br /> the building. I think the "T" off of the main driveway back to the final dwelling would be
<br /> sufficient, but this is just based on my knowledge of a recent building permit application and Fire
<br /> Department requirements on my property, so, it's just my two cents.
<br /> AU: Here, a, Commissioner Au .
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Commissioner Au, go ahead.
<br /> AU: So, to be fair to the Applicant, what Mr. Darrow, what Mr. Darrow was saying is that, you
<br /> know, every time a Special Permit is approved, there is a, there's a list of—and to be fair to the
<br /> Applicant, the Applicant should be able to review those conditions rather than us just saying,just
<br /> approving this application. So, my request to Commissioner Clarkson is somehow let's, let's
<br /> give the Applicant a chance to see the proposed conditions rather than just approving it outright.
<br /> Maybe can we get some guidance from Malia on this? Or I could be wrong.
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Malia?
<br /> HALL: Yes? Sorry?
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Yeah, go ahead, go ahead, Dean.
<br /> AU: So, Malia, I had a question that, you know, we're potentially going to approve this Special
<br /> Permit, and you know, we usually have a set of conditions so should it be fair for the Applicant
<br /> to review the whole criteria and the list of these conditions rather than me and Mr., me and
<br /> Commissioner Clarkson approving the motion with the conditions? I mean, how would you
<br /> advise us to move forward? Cause Jeff kind of hit it right on the nail. Moving forward, we need
<br /> to set conditions.
<br /> EXHIBIT A
<br /> 19
<br />
|