My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-06-04 Exh C Ted Tran-Tran-Tonnu FT REZ 20-240
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-06-04 Exh C Ted Tran-Tran-Tonnu FT REZ 20-240
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2020 2:23:50 PM
Creation date
7/2/2020 2:23:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AU: Mr. Chair? <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you. Go ahead, Mr. Au. <br /> AU: Since I was the one that made the motion, I'd like to comment on Commissioner <br /> Clarkson's comment. Since the Applicant has not requested it until after Commissioner <br /> Clarkson mentioned it, it was never part of a discussion, so I think I'm just going to leave the <br /> motion as it is and forward with that. Because if it was an issue, and I understand Commissioner <br /> Clarkson due to you know what is going on with the world right now, you know, you're <br /> watching out for the betterment of the community and the Applicants, but it wasn't requested <br /> initially by the Applicants. So, I'm just going to leave my motion as it stands. <br /> CLARKSON: No, I appreciate that Commissioner Au, and I just wanted to get clarification <br /> from Planning staff as to what the status of this timing condition was. I understood that it was <br /> hopefully going to be phased out, but if the Council is adamant about including it, I don't know, <br /> my, my suggestion was to train the Council or persuade the Council that this is really extraneous, <br /> but I'll, I'll leave it at that. Thank you. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you. Any further discussion? <br /> CLAY: Would the time limit be able to be extended if necessary? <br /> KAY: I can address that, Mr. Chair. Right now, the condition requires construction of the <br /> proposed development as substantially represented by the Applicant or as otherwise permitted by <br /> the zoning district within five years, and that's Condition B. We have our standard condition, <br /> and that's Condition Q for an administrative extension for up to an additional five years, so <br /> ultimately, the Applicant would have up to ten years to construct something on the property <br /> without having to come back to the Commission and County Council to amend, and the <br /> application itself said that they were looking to build by the end of 2021 which, you know, <br /> obviously the application came in before all the changes in the world here, but even so, there's a <br /> ten-year window before they would have to come back to this body or the County Council, up to <br /> a ten-year window. <br /> CLAY: He's good. <br /> TRAN: No, I'm good. <br /> RAFFIPIY: I'm sorry, did, Ms. Clay, were you trying to make a statement? <br /> CLAY: Oh, I'm sorry, Mr. Tran said that that's sufficient. <br /> RAFFIPIY: All right. Thank you very much. Any further discussions? All right, if there is no <br /> discussion, staff would you please do the roll call vote. <br /> KAY: Yes, thank you, Mr. Chair. Commissioner Au? <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.