Laserfiche WebLink
ROY: Yeah, I'm not sure about—what it would trigger, would be the need for a new review, say <br /> under SHPD because it'd be a whole new area outside of the site, the, you know,the site that <br /> they had previously looked at. So, that would have to be redone. You know, it could require <br /> them I suppose [HRS] 6E and 106 [National Historic Preservation Act] reviews because of the <br /> whole new location. Jeff may be able to talk to you about other requirements. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Jeff? <br /> DARROW: Thank you, Chair. The application when it comes in, it's for a specific area and a <br /> specific location. When its towers, its usually, for example, like [a] 30 by 30 square foot area. <br /> It's a very limited area. That's what's approved for the permit. I can almost guarantee that the <br /> area or the movement of that is going to be outside of that area that has been requested and has <br /> been agendized. So, at that point, it would have to come in as a new request. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you. Does that answer your question? <br /> AU: Yes, it does. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you <br /> AU: I want to leave my motion as it is. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Okay, thank you. Any other discussion? <br /> ROY: This is for, to adopt the Findings of Fact for New Cingular Wireless PCS AT&T Mobility <br /> Use Permit 19-082. <br /> HALL: This is Malia Hall. Just for clarification, you guys are deciding to adopt as is with no <br /> amendments? <br /> AU: Yes. <br /> HALL: Okay, thank you. <br /> ROY: Chair, I mean, Commissioner Au? <br /> AU: Aye. <br /> ROY: Commissioner Replogle? <br /> REPLOGLE: Aye. <br /> ROY: Commissioner Aguinaldo? <br /> AGUINALDO: Aye. <br /> EXHIBIT E <br /> 10 <br />