My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-06-04 Exh E New Cingular dba AT&T USE 19-082 (FOFCOLD&O)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-06-04 Exh E New Cingular dba AT&T USE 19-082 (FOFCOLD&O)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2020 2:35:00 PM
Creation date
7/2/2020 2:34:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROY: The Applicant is trying to speak. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Oh, Mr. Lyons. <br /> LYONS: Thank you so much, Chair. Just to clarify also that it's not just the Use Permit <br /> Application. Before AT&T can actually apply for a facility within the County, we also have to <br /> go through all the environmental, NHPA 106 the SHPD consultation process. So, there is a <br /> limitation in terms on how much we can do without having to effectively start over those <br /> processes, and it's typically about 10 meters, is the, is the limitation. Thank you. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Mr. Lyons. <br /> ROY: This is staff here. We would not have a problem, but I think the Applicant has outlined <br /> the issues that are involved with moving, so the, the burden seems to be on them, but to amend <br /> LYONS: It is typically [inaudible]. <br /> ROY: It wouldn't be impossible for us but again it seems like the hoops, we'd have to redo <br /> everything as the <br /> LYONS: " " <br /> CLARKSON: Can I ask a question of that? <br /> RAFFIPIY: Go ahead, Mr. Clarkson. <br /> CLARKSON: So, if the site were moved ten meters or less from its existing place, and the tower <br /> were moved within the site to be furthest away from habitable structures, roadways, parking lots, <br /> would you still be able to use your existing environmental studies and " " requirements? <br /> LYONS: To the Chair, this is Ken Lyons again. I believe we would. There are some constraints <br /> certainly as Andrew has identified also about the lease area. As you can tell, the tower sits <br /> within effectively, I believe it's a 50 by 50 lease area. If it goes beyond that, of course, we'd <br /> have to change the lease location with the " " but right now, as you can tell, the monopole <br /> actually sits in the middle of a 50 by 50 leased area. So, it'd be one of those things, you know, <br /> how far we go, what it would trigger to potentially trigger perhaps an amendment to the lease <br /> which, you know, we'd have to discuss with the—maybe take a few minutes to discuss that. <br /> But,the environmental approvals, we might be able to reuse so long it's less than ten years. <br /> CLARKSON: Thank you. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Ken. Any other questions for the Applicant? All right, so did <br /> everybody <br /> ROY: Commission Aguinaldo has his hand up. <br /> EXHIBIT E <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.