2020-07-02 Exh B Dr. Brian Sugai (Amend REZ 09-101)

Home

signed back in their country. Whatever their respective countries were. But the Kingdom enforced the contract which is kind of strange. The Kingdom had no jurisdiction over those contracts. Being that the contracts was signed in their country. So, there is a lot of historical defects or errors that gotta be corrected. So, going back to the lands, its Crown lands it is under the Office of the Crown it was leased out as Agriculture lands and the contract has ended. So, there should be no activity going on. Especially, for development when it was only leased out for Agriculture. No people living on it, no commercial activity. So, it's something to think about, remember "roads in limbo". These are not the ceded lands; the ceded lands are the 1,750,000 acres of Crown and government lands that had no contract on them. That's why they were illegally given away by the Banana Republic and the U.S. Congress could not have accepted that through a joint resolution. Which goes back to the 1875 Reciprocity Treaty. Which was no treaty because it's not Article II, Section 2 treaty. So, with this all reserve the rights of its Kingdom under the Queen's protest of January 17, 1893 against the criminal acts of US Minister Stevens. Most people don't realize he bombed this island and couple other islands when he came over on the navy ship. Inaudible-- scared the natives. That was criminal. So, if they said there was no shots fired, there were shots fired it wasn't in Oahu, it was on these islands. The other one is the 1898 Joint Resolution which is unconstitutional. The 1875 Reciprocity Treaty was no treaty and going back to 1820 President Monroe had no authority to appoint John C. Jones as the agent for the U.S. and sent over the missionary family and the US Navy. Here, you go back to Marbury vs. Madison. Thank you. RAFFIPIY: Thank you Mr. Vicente. Any questions from the Commission? Alright, thank you, I need a motion to close public testimony. REPLOGLE: I move that we close testimony. AGUINALDO: I second. RAFFIPIY: It's been moved and seconded that we close public testimony at this time. All in favor, say, aye". COMMISSIONERS: Aye. RAFFIPIY: Any oppose? No, oppose. Thank you. I need a motion for action at this time. REPLOGLE: I move that a favorable recommendation be forward to the County Council on the application of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 10 019 based on the Planning Director's recommendation which shall be adopted. AGUINALDO: I second. EXHIBIT B