Laserfiche WebLink
condition that the, the applicant needs to follow all federal, state, and county laws, and those <br /> things. But I understand what you're saying. Keeping them in there, if we can have something <br /> else to point, too, should there, we have anything come up in the future, then that, it's not a <br /> problem for us. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, and I think they can be edited a little bit just to indicate,particularly for <br /> Condition O, that instead of the condition being that they prepare these mitigation plans, the <br /> condition should be that they comply with the mitigation plans. <br /> CARR SMITH: Where is that in the paragraph? <br /> VITOUSEK: It says, "The appropriate Preservation Plan, Data Recovery Plan, [and] Monitoring <br /> Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the [State] Department of Land and Natural Resources," <br /> the second sentence. `Burial Treatment Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the Hawaii <br /> Island Burial Council for review and approval." So that's already been done but, you know, <br /> instead of indicating that it needs to be done, it should indicate that they should be complied <br /> with. <br /> KAY: Mike, would it make sense then, I guess we'd keep the identification on what the plans <br /> are and then have a sentence that basically says the applicant shall comply with all of the <br /> preceding plans, you know, all of the conditions of the preceding plans or something like that? <br /> Would that satisfy what you're talking about there? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, that would be my recommendation, for sure. <br /> KAY: And that was for O. Did you have any other language for N or just keep it as it was? <br /> Because it was, it was completed prior and submitted prior plans, for final plan approval. So we <br /> can do the same thing <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, same thing. It's a, it says that the archaeological inventory survey should be <br /> prepared and submitted to get approval. I think that it should say that the archaeological <br /> inventory, that the commitments made in the archaeological inventory survey plan should be <br /> adhered to. <br /> KAY: Can we say, "shall?" Mike <br /> VITOUSEK: What was that? <br /> KAY: —can we say, "shall?" <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, mm-hmm. <br /> KAY: Okay, thank you. <br /> CARR SMITH: So do we need some clarity for Noriko's sake on this? How would N read, <br /> Mike? Go ahead. <br /> 10 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />