Laserfiche WebLink
testimony in opposition to the amendments that was sent out by email. So at this point that's the <br /> entirety of the additional correspondences that we've received. <br /> With that, I'm happy to answer any questions the Commission may have. One last thing, I also <br /> have pardon me—also added the updated site plan, as well as the transect map that the applicant <br /> supplied, if we want to, you know, reference that in our, in our discussion. With that, I'm happy to <br /> answer any questions the Commission may have. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you, Christian. Could you perhaps hide your screen for the moment? <br /> KAY: Sure. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you. Great. Commissioners, do you have any questions for staff? Max, go <br /> ahead. <br /> NEWBERG: So, is the request in exemption for the affordable component still in place? They are <br /> asking to not provide any affordable housing through the project? <br /> KAY: I believe that their conditions that they were initially asking relief from, they've gone back <br /> and put those conditions back in. So in terms of the Suffolk proposal, the requirement that the <br /> housing, the rental housing for 20 years was put back in, as well as the representation that at least <br /> 20 percent would be, of the units would be at 80 percent AMI and then the remainder would be at <br /> 120 percent AMI. So those two initial requests to remove those conditions have been put back to the <br /> way the conditions initially read. <br /> NEWBERG: Thank you. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you. Anyone else have questions? Mr. Van Pernis? <br /> VAN PERNIS: Yes, Christian, does that affordable housing requirement require construction of <br /> affordable housing, or does it provide the opportunity for some sort of substitution of land or credits <br /> or whatever so that affordable housing is not integrated into the project? <br /> KAY: I believe that the housing condition requires actual housing be built on site and does not <br /> allow for the use of kind of affordable housing credits. So I do believe that their requirement to <br /> build on site is, was part of the original condition, and as that is going to be retained, that, or now <br /> proposed to be retained, that would be incorporated. <br /> CARR SMITH: Anyone else? Mike. <br /> VITOUSEK: - - - sorry, is the, so the application that the applicant is putting in the revised <br /> recommendation is maintaining the existing RM zoning? <br /> KAY: That's correct. Maija has got her hand raised, Madam Chair. <br /> CARR SMITH: Hi Maija, go ahead. <br /> 15 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />