Laserfiche WebLink
CARR SMITH: Number 2. <br /> VAN PERNIS: And there is a number of things in that section, I think no, it's not- - - <br /> CARR <br /> - -CARR SMITH: I have the email in front of me, and it looks as though it's paragraph, the paragraph <br /> that's numbered "2,"Mark. <br /> VAN PERNIS: Number 2. <br /> CARR SMITH: The one that says, "The applicants are not the real applicants,"then talks about <br /> your conversation with Mr. Rapoza. <br /> VAN PERNIS: Okay, so we are strikingI got it—we are striking the reference to Mr. Rapoza, my <br /> conversation with him <br /> CARR SMITH: We are striking Item No. 2. <br /> VAN PERNIS: that would be the first sentence and the <br /> CARR SMITH: What is the motion <br /> VAN PERNIS: —last sentence. <br /> CARR SMITH: Excuse me, Mark <br /> VAN PERNIS: First and last sentences of No. 2 and all of the unnumbered in parentheses section <br /> beginning with the words, "Some Commissioners." - - -by the way <br /> CARR SMITH: - - -that's your input, let's see <br /> VAN PERNIS: —one of the commissioners asked me that question. <br /> CARR SMITH: Mr. Vitousek, what's your intention on the motion,please? <br /> VITOUSEK: The intention of the motion is to strike any discussion on the previous deposition <br /> between Commissioner Van Pernis and Mr. Cook, and also to strike any reference to discussions <br /> and/or investigation outside of the scope of the Leeward Planning Commission, or reference to Mr., <br /> discussion with Mr. Rapoza. <br /> CARR SMITH: All right, so that's all of the first paragraph on the email, and on Item No. 2-1 <br /> don't know where that ends, unless we just say Number 2 that we strike. You guys have the email in <br /> front of you? <br /> KEALOHA: I do, and my second was to the assumption that 1 and 2 be stricken. <br /> 9 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />