Laserfiche WebLink
D. IMAGIRE: Good morning, I don't really have much to add to what Zendo said. You know, <br /> we would want to be able to run our business and comply with the law so, that is why we are <br /> asking for a little bit of leeway. Like I understand that you do not want us to like have a ton of <br /> employees and that's completely understandable. As a resident in the neighborhood myself I <br /> wouldn't want another business in there having a ton of employees. But, if we can make it <br /> instead of it's being cause right now, I believe it says me, my husband, and one (1) employee. If <br /> we could make it so that it's no more than three (3)total that would really give us some <br /> flexibility to be able to run our business the way we've been running it in Kea`au, without having <br /> to make significant changes to staffing and things like that. <br /> As you may remember, I am six (6) months pregnant so I'm not going to be in the office very <br /> much over the next year I'll be with the baby. With regards to the driveway, you know we <br /> would love to have the private, straight back private driveway and one separate for the business <br /> to try and keep those two (2) separate but, again like Zendo said if that's not something that you <br /> are willing to consider for us. We will make it work to make so that we can access both business <br /> and private portions of the lot via one (1) entrance on `Ilima. Thank you. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much. Anything else Zendo? <br /> ZENDO: Thank you Mr. Chair. So that's pretty much as simple as we can, we are open to <br /> discussion on any of that and just again thank you guys and want to again apologize for all of the <br /> confusion and anything that might have came off the wrong way. Thanks so, I'll be happy to <br /> answer any questions. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much. Any questions for the Applicant from the Commission? Go <br /> ahead Joe. <br /> CLARKSON: Yes, I was the one who made the original motion and I'm leaning favorably <br /> toward the three (3)workers whether it's two (2) Applicants or one (1) assistant or two (2) <br /> assistants and one (1)Applicant. I see no problem with that. I just have a question for the <br /> Applicant. After the June meeting there was general agreement on what the conditions would be <br /> to basically make this business as much as possible like a home business and one of those things <br /> was the single driveway with the access to the business portion of property off of that driveway, <br /> Then the business portion was "—" landscaping. The only condition that was asked for by the <br /> Applicant were only the hesitation was the, they had to confirm that the single driveway was <br /> possible with the Fire Department. Here it's been two (2) months and apparently, the Applicant <br /> hasn't even contacted the Fire Department. They certainly didn't before the last meeting. I'm <br /> just curious about that. Have you contacted the Fire Department? <br /> KERN: Ms. Imagire did contact them, go ahead Deidre. <br /> D. IMAGIRE: Yeah, we were able, the person that we needed to speak to at the Fire Department <br /> was actually on vacation. We were able to get a last-minute meeting with him just before our <br /> June meeting. It was June, the last one we had whenever that was. I'm so confused. Sorry. We <br /> were able to meet with him and basically what they are saying is that they will not say anything <br /> firm and final until we are asking for that change of use. At the time we ask for the change of <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> 4 <br />