Laserfiche WebLink
JACKSON: I believe the proposed improvements will be on the limited common elements. <br /> VAN PERNIS: And who owns the limited common elements. <br /> JACKSON: The applicants. <br /> VAN PERNIS: And then terms of the easement, have you reviewed the easement and seen <br /> whether it allows commercial traffic? <br /> JACKSON: The easement over Waiono Ranch Road was provided in the deed, it was described <br /> in the deed, and it did not describe any limitations. <br /> VAN PERNIS: Isn't it correct that any of the owners up in Waiono Meadows could litigate to <br /> stop the use of the commercial activity in the easement? <br /> JACKSON: That's a legal question. <br /> VAN PERNIS: All right, the other legal question would be, what is the liability of the county for <br /> allowing a use that is not allowed by the Condominium Property Regime? <br /> MUKAL Again this is John Mukai for the Planning Department—it's not the Planning <br /> Department's, I mean, it's a private matter between the condo owners; they can do whatever they <br /> want to each other. But don't expect Planning to go in and be the arbiter of the CPRS or any of <br /> the CC&Rs on the property. <br /> VAN PERNIS: But it's going to allow a certain use regardless of not being an arbitrator of the <br /> CPR meaning. <br /> MUKAL That's why they applied for the Special Permit. <br /> CARR SMITH: Very good, thank you. Mr. Vitousek. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, I just, I just kind of want to echo Commissioner Van Pernis's concern. In <br /> the, you know, I do understand what the counsel is saying about how the Planning Commission <br /> or county is not the arbitrator of a CC&R concern. But my understanding is that the CC&Rs are <br /> the lowest level of enforcement for that property, meaning that they have to be adhered to but <br /> technically it's up to the members of the association to enforce that privately through action, <br /> through legal action. I agree with Mr. Van Pernis that for us to be approving an action that <br /> would basically be setting up the community to have to police itself seems like it could <br /> potentially put the county in liability, and I would like to know a little bit more about that. <br /> Specifically, my question, you know, is coming from the CC&Rs, Section 5.3(7), Use of the <br /> Product [sic -Project], "All occupants shall exercise care in the use of musical instruments, <br /> radios, televisions and amplifiers, and shall otherwise avoid making noises that may disturb other <br /> occupants"; so, to me, the CC&Rs are indicating that they are not allowing loud noises, loud <br /> 10 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />