My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-09-21 Leeward Exh B (USE 20-000083)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-09-21 Leeward Exh B (USE 20-000083)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2020 6:41:27 PM
Creation date
10/15/2020 6:41:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CARR SMITH: Let's move along to the applicant's presentation. Mr. Myrick, would you like <br /> to raise your right hand,please? Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth before the Leeward <br /> Planning Commission today? <br /> MYRICK: Yes, I do. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you. You can tell us whether or not you have read the background report <br /> and the recommendation, whether you have any issues or concerns with that, and you can go <br /> ahead and start by letting us know your name and where you're from, and who you're <br /> representing. Go ahead. <br /> MYRICK: Okay. My name is Shamaury Myrick and I'm with Tower Engineering <br /> Professionals, and we are representing SBA Towers, LLC for this application, and we are located <br /> in Charlotte, North Carolina. I have read the staff's recommendation and I, me and Christian <br /> kind of went over it earlier last week, and we have no problems with the recommendation from <br /> staff, or the conditions from staff to remove the barbed wire from the compound, and we're okay <br /> with everything that staff is recommending. <br /> CARR SMITH: Very good. Thank you. <br /> MYRICK: And the only thing that I would like to emphasize that again, this is a, we're trying to <br /> replace an existing tower that is becoming structurally unsound, so, with, in doing that, RF was <br /> able to design the new tower to be lower, to not, to be lower than the current tower and still work <br /> at an optimum level, as well asI know there was some concerns about 5G and the health <br /> concerns and all of that. Like I said before, we have no knowledge of any 5G antenna to be on <br /> this, this tower. And 5G deployment usually is consistent with more of a small cell deployment <br /> as opposed to locating antennas or towers. So, that's pretty much what I want to bring to the <br /> board. <br /> CARR SMITH: So, is there any reason, Christian, that that wouldn't be a condition? They are <br /> not aware of any 5G going on the tower, but, should that be something that we need to make sure <br /> is what actually happens? <br /> KAY: I'm not sure that we have the authority to determine what type of technology goes on <br /> towers. I might defer to our corporation counsel on that. We are guided by federal statute from <br /> Federal Communications Commission on what we can and can't approve or deny permits for <br /> towers or telecommunication facilities for. So, I guess the non-answer to your question is, is I'm <br /> not aware that we have the ability to place such a condition on a permit, but I would defer <br /> possibly to J on that. <br /> CARR SMITH: Very good, thank you. All right, so, does that finish your presentation, <br /> Mr. Myrick? <br /> MYRICK: Yes, and I'm, I'm here to answer any, any additional questions that the commission <br /> may have. <br /> 6 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.