My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-12-18 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-12-18 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2020 10:32:04 AM
Creation date
11/4/2020 10:32:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board December 18, 2019 <br /> CHR. NAMAHOE: So, at the time when you elaborate further, a little later on today, then you'll <br /> also talk—well, the question that comes to mind is creating two positions out of what previously <br /> was one position—has that been—what's the budget calisthenics for you? <br /> MR. BRILHANTE: That's a very good question and that was in one of my primary areas of <br /> consideration when I was laying this out. I think, at the end of the day, the conclusion I drew <br /> upon was the fact that because the way the previous hierarchy or organization was structured, I <br /> had one individual who didn't have much work comp experience but had a great breadth of <br /> experience in the safety and the training area—managing the work comp division. The work <br /> comp division, that budget, in and of itself, stand alone is 2 point something—$2.2 million a year <br /> in payments and the like. <br /> So, I felt—and I have documentation to prove that we're bleeding money out of the work comp <br /> division—and a lot of that was because there wasn't enough attention spent on just managing the <br /> work comp claims. <br /> So, when I separated the two, I brought in a manager who has a strong background in work <br /> comp. She was in the private sector for 17 years where she did both vocational rehab. and <br /> return-to-work programs for a private entity here in Hilo exceptional references. And I brought <br /> her on board, and that's going to be part of my report—and we're saving so much money that <br /> we've more than doubled the salary that we've associated—we had to expend for creating that <br /> new position. <br /> So, and what I actually did was I took a lower level managers position, I reallocated it up to a <br /> higher level. So, all we're doing for that reorg—the only added expenditures—the difference <br /> between those two position—classes of work, which is significantly lower than if we created a <br /> brand-new position. <br /> The other thing I did to save some money is, if you've noticed, I still don't have a deputy. So, <br /> I've held off on appointing a deputy and because salary and wages are conclusive of—it's the <br /> totality of the whole budget is associate—is assigned to salary and wages. So, if I can save a <br /> dollar here, I get to use it, a dollar, one salary here—I get to use it for another position. <br /> So, I'm looking at maybe the first quarter of next—this coming year, to appoint a deputy. And I <br /> think I should have enough savings realized so that I can go forward with that. But I just, kind <br /> of, robbed from Peter to pay Paul for a little while going forward. Or I should say "borrowed." <br /> So, those are my three goals for last year and how we addressed them. Going forward is the <br /> survey results. Should I do—should I present my goals for 2019 or 20, or do you guys want to <br /> discuss the survey results first? <br /> MS. NAMAHOE: I'm happy to take your direction. I mean, we've already read these bullets in <br /> and I—you've also explained to us that you have a—you're—a balance of schedule concerns <br /> right now? <br /> Page 1 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.