My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-10-01 Exh A Public Testimony (PD Initiated Relating to Use Permits)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-10-01 Exh A Public Testimony (PD Initiated Relating to Use Permits)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2020 12:40:50 PM
Creation date
11/5/2020 12:40:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RAFFIPIY: Thank you ma'am now you may proceed. <br /> HARDEN: Yes, okay, thank you. So, I am testifying on agenda one, I understand it was <br /> dropped postponed. So, first I want to thank you folks for your service on the Commission and <br /> thank the staff for getting this online thing working. Let's see and I believe the item was <br /> postponed because people raised concerns that the text of the amendment wasn't available to the <br /> public until two (2) days before the meeting. I think it was postponed because of Sunshine Law <br /> considerations and I appreciate if that was the reason appreciate it was done. <br /> But I'm doing a testimony kind of as a heads up for when it comes around again. My biggest <br /> concern are two provisions that might allow bad projects. One, right now a written objection is <br /> enough to stop a project, but the amendments would change that to be a contested case hearing <br /> and you folks all know what a contested case hearing involved. A great deal of work for the <br /> person filing the case often at the expense of hiring a lawyer. We should keep it to a written <br /> objection to stop that projects from getting through. <br /> Second concern right now the projects are automatically approved if a Commission does not <br /> decide by the deadline. Instead, they should be automatically denied, to follow precautionary <br /> principle and keep bad projects from getting through. What if the Commission work gets <br /> disrupted by an eruption, tsunami and storm or a pandemic like we're having now and to give <br /> denied applicants a second chance there could be some kind of expedited simplified process for <br /> them to reapply. I think is should be automatic denial and not automatic approval. <br /> Couple other concerns the amendments talk about the close of public hearing, but it is not clear if <br /> they mean Planning Commission, Board of Appeals, County Council or Court. Also, a permit <br /> can be revoked if a Director sees there's non-compliance with conditions, or threats to health and <br /> safety. But if the Director isn't doing anything there should be a way for the public to go straight <br /> to the Commission. And last, we should keep the current language saying a permit can be <br /> revoked if the use has been abandoned for two (2)years. The revisions would require a written <br /> statement of abandonment from the owner but, what if the owner refuses to write a statement. <br /> Alright, thank you for your attention. <br /> JACKSON: Thomas, you are on mute. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much, thank you Ms. Harden, thank you Maija. <br /> The testimony ended at 9:10 a.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Melissa Dacayanan-Salvador <br /> Temporary Assigned Secretary <br /> 2 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.