My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-08-04 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2020
>
2020-08-04 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/27/2020 4:00:13 PM
Creation date
11/27/2020 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairman Roth—Chairman Roth said, "So, motion by Commissioner Werchick. Do we <br /> have asecond?" <br /> Commissioner Kern - Kern seconded the motion. <br /> Chairman Roth - Chairman confirmed that the motion was seconded by Commissioner <br /> Kern. <br /> Chairman Roth - Chairman asked if the Commissioners had any discussion on the <br /> motion. <br /> Commissioner Hetherington—Hetherington asked, if they needed to list in the motion <br /> what they would like to include, or could it be taken from the minutes. <br /> Commissioner Werchick - Werchick said, that it can either be taken from the minutes or <br /> consultation between the applicant and staff. <br /> Chairman Roth—Chairman assured Commissioners that the applicant heard their <br /> comments regarding his presentation and project. He also assured the applicant that the <br /> Commissioners want to approve his application, but would need the story of his project to <br /> be more reliable and something they can understand. <br /> Chairman Roth—"We have the motion on the table by Commissioner's Werchick and <br /> Kern. Is there any discussion on the motion?" <br /> Ms. Newlon (Staff) —Staff needed more clarity on the motion. <br /> Chairman Roth—Chairman asked if Commissioner Werchick could restate the motion. <br /> Commissioner Werchick - Werchick stated, that the motion was to defer and request <br /> that the applicant submit a revised set of plans, showing what the project will actually <br /> consist of. He made it broad enough so that it will allow the applicant to submit <br /> photographs as Chairman Roth suggested, as existing and the applicant doesn't have to <br /> do a new set of drawings. The applicant can decide what will be the best way to show <br /> their plans, but need to present something to the Commissioners of what they want to <br /> build and what they plan to change. "It's a motion to defer, to request a revised set of <br /> plans, to answer the questions about the project that were raised at tonight's <br /> meeting." <br /> Ms. Newlon (Staff): Staff repeats, "It's a motion to defer and have the applicant submit <br /> a revised set of plans to show what the project will actually consist of and include photos <br /> so that Commissioners understand what the applicant is proposing to build." <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.