My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-08-04 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2020
>
2020-08-04 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/27/2020 4:00:13 PM
Creation date
11/27/2020 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairman Roth—Roth asked Commissioners if they had more questions for the <br /> applicant. <br /> Ms. Newlon (Staff) —Newlon comments that when a building permit comes in for a <br /> review by plan checkers, and they see bar sinks on a counter similar to these presented, in <br /> each bedroom down stairs, they will be stamped as not approved and as a second kitchen. <br /> They will be giving a single family dwelling notice to the owner, notifying them that <br /> these are to remain as a single family dwelling. Each duplex can only have a single <br /> kitchen. They will be approved as bar sinks and not approved for second kitchens. <br /> Chairman Roth—Roth moves forward to a discussion. He begins the discussion by <br /> stating that he is not completely convinced on what the applicant has presented. Referring <br /> his concerns to the parking and the inconsistency of applicant's story. Roth supports <br /> additional housing and keeping it low cost. He said that it is a great place to have more <br /> housing, but housing should not be substandard. It starts to become substandard when it <br /> doesn't follow all the rules and that he would like to see a consistent presentation of the <br /> yard space and what is on the parcel currently. The applicant described the bottom floor <br /> to be empty spaces, however, it is being presented as a duplex and not a single family <br /> dwelling. "This raises questions," said Roth. "It's a nice looking project. The finishes are <br /> tasteful. It has a nice lanai, and sounds like there is a lot of good things about it."He <br /> understands the applicant's story of the sewer being a question, and has a legitimate <br /> reason to have their plan changed from a single family dwelling to a duplex. The bar <br /> sinks in bedrooms and other places around houses, are not necessarily a red flag. Roth <br /> explained that he does a lot of high end residences where there are bar sinks all over the <br /> place. He thinks people should be allowed to do that, but at the same context, need <br /> assurance that this is not going to become a six unit building. Parking and safety is a <br /> concern. <br /> Chairman Roth—Chairman opens the floor to discussion. <br /> Commissioner Hetherington—Hetherington agrees with Chairman. He was concerned <br /> about rooms on the second floor having their own entrance and no access from one room <br /> to the other, a concern that could raise red flags, but not illegal. He commented that the <br /> KVDC went a little beyond their duties as Commissioners, by addressing building and <br /> planning matters. The applicant should have had his contractor rough in the plumbing, <br /> but building looked good and hopes that the landscaping is installed as designed. <br /> Commissioner Smith- Commissioner Smith suggested to defer and would like clarity <br /> on all the questions Chairman Roth stated. <br /> Chairman Roth - Chairman wanted Commissioner's to be clear and sure that if they <br /> were to defer, what is it that they want to see when the applicant returns to KVDC. Chair <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.