Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: Yes, I just liked to clarify my view of the parking issue as I seconded the motion. <br /> I didn't hear anything from the Director or from Planning Staff that contradicted Mr. Rock's <br /> assertation that the actual Code minimum of 1.25 was typically ample for this kind of <br /> development. And that when the Director was talking about a possible change from 1.8 to 1.5 <br /> his concern was more for certainty rather than the actual number. So, I would support the 1.5. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you. Any other comments? If no comments, staff take the roll call vote. <br /> AGUINALDO: Commissioner Raffipiy, I have one. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Go ahead. <br /> AGUINALDO: Just clarification. Is removing Condition J correct? And leaving it up to Public <br /> Works to make their necessary recommendation for anything to do with traffic devices. Am I <br /> understanding that correctly Commissioners? <br /> KAY: That's correct. <br /> AGUINALDO: Okay, I yield. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Alright, any other, any other comments, questions? Okay staff take the roll call <br /> voter please. <br /> KAY: Yes, thank you Mr. Chair. Commissioner Au? <br /> AU: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Clarkson? <br /> CLARKSON: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Aguinaldo? <br /> AGUINALDO: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Replogle? <br /> REPLOGLE: Aye. <br /> KAY: And Chair Raffipiy? <br /> RAFFIPIY: Aye. <br /> KAY: Thank you Mr. Chair motion carries 5-0. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> 26 <br />