My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-11-05 Exh A Ikaika Ohana (Amend REZ 09-103)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-11-05 Exh A Ikaika Ohana (Amend REZ 09-103)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 11:03:38 AM
Creation date
12/3/2020 11:03:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
indicating the Police Department's concerns they indicated they thought the Zoning Code <br /> required one and a quarter spaces would be sufficient for the project. <br /> So, based on that and to try address the Police Department's concerns and to provide clarity on <br /> what that number of additional spaces should be because the way that the condition is written is <br /> very ambiguous and open to a lot of interpretation. The Director is recommending that we <br /> amend Condition E to require 1.8 parking spaces per dwelling unit which would be 116 spaces at <br /> full build out if they build the 64-units. So, basically the Director at this point is locking in that <br /> number. The Director under our Zoning Code has the authority to determine or require more <br /> parking than what the Code requires. If he or she sees that there's going to be a community <br /> benefit or benefit public safety and at this point the Director is making that determination and <br /> articulating proposing to amend the condition to articulate that in the Condition E. <br /> Again, this is one of those situations where if for whatever reason the affordable housing <br /> development does not get developed then it would just fall back to the original condition. So, <br /> again just to recap the Director's recommendation is to forward a favorable recommendation to <br /> the County Council for the Applicant's proposed amendments to Condition E & G, favorable <br /> recommendation with modifications to Conditions P & R and an unfavorable recommendation <br /> for the proposed amendment to Condition J of rezone Ordinance 10 32. <br /> I want to point out that after we sent our background and recommendation report we got two (2) <br /> pieces of correspondence. First would be an email from Ann Toma with concerns about traffic <br /> and then we also received a correspondence from Carlsmith Ball which is a water commitment <br /> time extension request to the Department of Water Supply addressing some of Water Supply's <br /> comments and requirements. With that I am happy to answer any questions that the Commission <br /> may have and unless some of the conditions require the presentation I'll go ahead and stop <br /> sharing that right now. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you Christian. Any questions from the Commission? Go ahead <br /> Commissioner Au. <br /> AU: Thank you Chair Raffipiy. Christian can you bring up that screen with the proposed <br /> development? <br /> KAY: Sure, one moment please. <br /> AU: So, my question is I might have missed it but the egress and the in and the out of both <br /> entrances of the property. Can you point that out again to me? <br /> KAY: Sure, will one moment please. So, here is the proposed site plan. The Kapi`olani Street <br /> entrance would be here and I believe there is a condition of approval on Kapi`olani Street which <br /> limits it to right in, right out. Let me find that condition of approval here. That's been maintain <br /> through this amendment request and then the Kukuau Street ingress/egress is going to be toward <br /> the top of this screen here. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.