My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-01-07 Windward Exh E (Discussion permit extension)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-01-07 Windward Exh E (Discussion permit extension)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2021 1:03:30 PM
Creation date
2/4/2021 1:03:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the Commission rules when they review projects, so it was clear as to the criteria for approval or <br /> denial for an amendment. But on top of that a point that we're trying to do as part of this overall <br /> request is adding specific language into our rules that is currently not there. We don't have <br /> anything in our rules that gives us direction as far as criteria for approval or denial for an <br /> amendment or a time extension. As I mentioned we've been utilizing the criteria that's in the <br /> condition that we use for the administrative permit. So, we're trying to take that language and <br /> put it into the rules but, again taking into consideration this added information and request from <br /> the Leeward Planning Commission to beef that up as part of the review. <br /> We do have certain rules that say like if a period of time has passed an Applicant needs to do an <br /> updated traffic study or something but it's very limited as far as the overall scope of all the <br /> different types reports that could be needed because of the passage of time. <br /> CLARKSON: Thank you. <br /> DARROW: Any other questions? So, moving forward staff will prepare some language for both <br /> the recusal as well as the criteria for amendments and we will provide that to the Commission as <br /> well as hopefully some type of guidelines that Commissioner Clarkson had requested to give <br /> some direction as to what bias or prejudice issues might mean in relation to everyday life. From <br /> there once we're prepared with these other rule changes that we are working on we will prepare a <br /> joint Planning Commission meeting and try to get through these amendments. Thank you and if <br /> I haven't said already Happy New Year. <br /> The hearing was adjourned at 12:33 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Melissa Dacayanan-Salvador <br /> Secretary Windward Planning Commission <br /> 4 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.