My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-01-07 Windward Exh B COH Parks and Recreationn SMA 20-000077
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-01-07 Windward Exh B COH Parks and Recreationn SMA 20-000077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 7:42:24 AM
Creation date
2/10/2021 7:42:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KOMATA: Yeah, I would appreciate the "shall"being changed to a"should". We did review it <br /> with our design team and with Ron as well and it appears that our designers have taken into <br /> account a lot of these Best Management Practices already. So, because we have, or you guys had <br /> the benefit of a fully developed set of plans I was wondering if there was anything specifically <br /> on top of that that you guys want to see. Especially under the "shall" condition, but if it's a <br /> "should" I think we are comfortable with that. <br /> ROY: Yeah, I have no problem with the "should", like Maija said it's a general condition just to <br /> remind those working in that area to take a look at that if there is something that can be used it <br /> would be great to use that. But otherwise, I have no problem with changing the Applicant <br /> "should" implement . <br /> KOMATA: Okay, thank you. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, thank you. <br /> KOMATA: That's the only concern that we have as far as the conditions go from Parks and <br /> Recreation side. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. Any discussion? <br /> AU: Mr. Chair, I have a question. <br /> REPLOGLE: Yes, Mr. Au. <br /> AU: Thank you Mr. Terry, Mr. Komata and Mr. Sakai for being here. This is a project that the <br /> community has been waiting for, from my understanding the park's been closed for five (5)years <br /> is that correct? <br /> KOMATA: The park is actually open right now. I think what Alex had mentioned about having <br /> to walk down, I think we had reopened a few months ago. People are able to drive down to the <br /> park and get there. Once we were able to work with DOT to cordon off or secure the areas with <br /> the higher lead content in the soil and be able to re-establish a safe maintenance practice down <br /> there. So, the park is open, and people are able to get down there and park in the park. <br /> AU: Okay, well I guess what I was alluding to was it has been closed for a long time and this is <br /> a project that the community needs so that they can enjoy the facilities and enjoy the park down <br /> there. I guess my question is more for maybe Mr. Funai, Mr. Yen and Mr. Terry and maybe Mr. <br /> Komata and Mr. Sakai if you guys can elaborate on that. There was an issue about the lead, and <br /> you know I understand this project is moving forward because you guys already, because the <br /> County is already designing it. It looks pretty complete to me and I understand the lead project <br /> is going to be concurrent if this project gets approved by this Commission. If the Special Use <br /> Permit gets approved, then everything is going to go concurrently, and I just want to know where <br /> the lead project is at and if it is going to be anticipated to be done at the same time when the <br /> improvements are going to be done. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.