Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: A follow up question and for staff I mean I can't remember the law are there <br /> expirations on these SMA permits or time limits it sounds like this is going to be a multi-year <br /> project. Do we "—" <br /> ROY: Ten (10)years to complete the project. <br /> CLARKSON: How long? <br /> ROY: 10 years. Condition three (3), construction of proposed facility improvements shall be <br /> substantially completed within 10 years. <br /> CLARKSON: No, okay. Thank you. <br /> REPLOGLE: I have a question. The lead removal is being done by DOT and that's where the <br /> lead is in their area of responsibility or is there lead removal involved in the County's area? Are <br /> you both doing that, I think it was answered but is that lead removal taken place simultaneously <br /> and the other question is while that lead removal is taken place is the public allowed to be down <br /> there around that? Thank you. <br /> KOMATA: So, again James from Parks and Recreation. So, as Alex had mentioned there are <br /> two (2) separate sources of lead contamination at the park. One is the bridge that DOT is <br /> responsible for and one is the buildings because of the probably the lead in the paint that was <br /> used in some other building materials in the past. So, between the State's responsibility and the <br /> County's responsibility there's a pretty clear demarcation as to what our scopes are. The <br /> County's is going to be addressing the lead in the soil source from the buildings and DOT will be <br /> addressing the lead in the soil from the bridge. The projects like I said earlier, DOT's project is <br /> anticipated to go first, and we'd like them to go through first address the soil area because again <br /> that's further into the site than ours it also impacts some of the improvements that we need to do <br /> such as the septic system for the new comfort station as well as a new comfort station in the new <br /> pavilion. <br /> So, if we don't have to have our contractor working in that hazardous material areas better for us <br /> and our contractors. So — <br /> REPLOGLE: Right. <br /> KOMATA: —that would go first, and the County project would go next. The intent is to <br /> address all of the current sources of known lead in soil contamination that could affect and would <br /> affect the public health and safety as well as that of our staff and maintenance crews. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. <br /> KOMATA: As far as where we are right now, we've in collaboration with DOT and Department <br /> of Health (DOH) their here office, you know we have been working with them to ensure that the <br /> public can continue to access the park in its current condition safely. Like I said we in <br /> conjunction with DOT had identified the area of high concern that has been fenced off or <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> 9 <br />