2021-01-07 Windward Exh C AT&T Mobility USE 20-000084

Home

AU: Yes, that answers my question I had for you and yeah Maija if you could just follow up with that and I think I know what the answer is but if you could just talk about if there's any lava requirements in our laws and the County laws. JACKSON: Thank you Commissioner Au. Currently there are not other than like Andrew said any building structural requirements. But I do know that the lava recovery effort is looking at implementing various strategies of whether or not to allow certain development in the area that was affected by the 2018 eruption. So far these are just ideas, strategies being discussed but nothing has been implemented. REPLOGLE: Mr. Clarkson? CLARKSON: Yes, I have a question for the Applicant. Regarding your recommendation for an on-site archaeologist. Do you have any knowledge of the land use history of the proposed site? Has it ever been in any kind of commercial cultivation or has it ever been bulldozed? In other words,just trying to get in my mind that the likelihood of the necessity for an on-site archaeologist. I mean if this is an area that has never had much human impact, I might consider attaching that as a condition. But otherwise, could you expand on what you know of the history of the site. TOMLINSON: Sure. The parcel has had quite a bit of development on it with the quarry down in the area the southern part of the parcel the large quarry operations. This specific piece one thousand (1,000) about 1,050 square foot has not been developed. Its right off the dirt road, access road that comes through the property. Right now, it's still forested with a mix of invasive trees, some ohia in the area so it is not a complete native forest, but it has had some disruption probably because of the road development. But I don't think it's been in agriculture. CLARKSON: Thank you. RAFFIPIY: Mr. Chairman, I have a question. REPLOGLE: Yes, Mr. Raffipiy please. RAFFIPIY: Alright, kind of a two-part question. This is about a co-location off antennas. I appreciate that. The provision in the application to allow co-location. I'm looking at the exhibits to the application attachment number six (6)photos site photos and photo stimulations. I'm particularly looking at the photos of the monopole picture on the sheet 2 of 3 and 3 of 3 where it says the proposed equipment on monopole. So, if this is the picture if this picture here depicts what the actual layout of the antennas is going to be. How would an additional antenna be co- located with that area so crowded? There's going to be an attachment on the bottom of it or will it be extended up and allow the co-location antenna co-located antennas to be installed above it? The second part of the question is if we are going to allow co-location which I would highly recommend that we allow co-location antennas. Will the new provider be coming into Commission to get a permit for to be co-located on that antenna? EXHIBIT C 10