My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-01-07 Windward Exh C AT&T Mobility USE 20-000084
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-01-07 Windward Exh C AT&T Mobility USE 20-000084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 7:44:21 AM
Creation date
2/10/2021 7:44:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HALL: Thank you. <br /> REPLOGLE: That's a great idea. <br /> TOMLINSON: I think I get where you are coming from in general with your line of <br /> questioning. So, I'll answer the first part about the COW location, its down in Kalapana and to <br /> be honest I don't know the precise location but it's very much south towards the water. In terms <br /> of COW's there they are temporary facilities that don't provide the bandwidth level of service <br /> that this permanent facility would provide. So, it's again a temporary solution as would be I <br /> would imagine T-Mobile's and Verizon's and so we wouldn't be able to co-locate on those. <br /> In terms of the Verizon tower my understanding is as Maija pointed out it's much further south <br /> down the road from our location and it's also not built. It being south is a significant factor <br /> because we identified these particular areas where we need to cover more north up the road. So, <br /> that's why this particular location is chosen, it got the elevation, and exposure to the road as well <br /> as pointing down towards Kalapana and gives us connectivity back up closer to our other towers <br /> towards Pahoa. If in the future Verizon builds their tower down towards the south and there's a <br /> need for coverage down, there those are always considered co-location areas are always <br /> considered as part of the process in development. <br /> So, this particular location was chosen because it fills the significant gap that's been identified <br /> for the area and meets the objectives that AT & T is really specifically trying to identify <br /> particularly for FirstNet. FirstNet has requirements that these facilities get built in a timely <br /> fashion in the very near future here. So, there's a need to fill this demand from FirstNet in <br /> particular as well as other coverage in the area for the general public. That's why we are moving <br /> on this location. <br /> AGUINALDO: Another one Andrew, would it be, why build it right away? Why don't we like <br /> you just said the COW and I'm pretty sure your COW is right behind the old Catholic painted <br /> church. We call them by the water spigot down there. So, I'm very familiar with where your <br /> COW is located that's why I asked the questions if you knew where your — <br /> TOMLINSON: Sure. <br /> AGUINALDO: — COW was. How come AT & T doesn't put a temporary COW for now, see <br /> if it works the signal or whatever because it's temporary versus just putting up a permanent <br /> COW. Not a permanent COW but a permanent cell tower. <br /> TOMLINSON: Facility. <br /> AGUINALDO: Yeah. <br /> TOMLINSON: Because the COW's do not provide the bandwidths and the frequencies for LTE <br /> as well as FirstNet. Their basic phone services only so they won't fulfill the requirements that <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.