Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: I'll let Dean go first. <br /> AU: Chair, I have one more. <br /> REPLOGLE: Oh, there is one? Yes, go ahead. <br /> AU: I have one more question so, really quick Mr. Tomlinson you guys are aware or AT & T <br /> your client is aware the property is in Lava Zone 1 right. You know everybody that buys in it <br /> just make sure that you guys know— <br /> TOMLINSON: Yes. <br /> AU: — it's in there. <br /> TOMLINSON: Yes. <br /> AU: And just like any other home builder there is a potential that your facility could get <br /> damaged. So just wanted to make that clear. <br /> TOMLINSON: Oh, absolutely and it's actually one of the reasons why we need to go in the <br /> areas cause emergency response because there are eruption events. So, yeah, we are very aware <br /> of it. Thank you. <br /> REPLOGLE: Any other questions from the Commission? <br /> CLARKSON: I just have one. Through the co-location condition in the conditions from the <br /> Planning Department and there is no requirement that the structure be built sufficiently strong to <br /> allow co-location. I'm going to want to make that a condition of approval that the tower <br /> structure be built sufficiently strong in both foundation and mass. That it allows an equivalent an <br /> antenna structure to the proposed structure below the Applicant's antennas. So, that should some <br /> other company come along and say hey we want to co-locate below your antennas we don't get <br /> into a situation that says oh, sorry. This tower can't support more antennas on this site. So, I <br /> think one suggestion would be to the Department to include some kind of structural requirement <br /> for co-location and then I'll ask Mr. Tomlinson if he has any objection to that condition. <br /> TOMLINSON: I think we're fine with that in terms of our design again it's difficult to know <br /> exactly what a co-locator would be required to have but the tower will be built to structural to the <br /> Code. So, in general it will be fine. <br /> CLARKSON: I'm being very specific here. Basically, to duplicate your existing antenna <br /> structure at an elevation below the proposed antennas that would be suitable that would not <br /> interfere with your antennas but as high as possible without interfering and design the tower to at <br /> least to accommodate the duplication of your antennas assuming that other companies would <br /> have similar antennas that they would need if they co-located. That's the only way I can think of <br /> to have a condition that would be specific enough to be given to an engineer and say yeah, yeah, <br /> we can do that. We'll just double the number of antennas and design the tower accordingly. <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> 17 <br />