My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-01-07 Windward Exh C AT&T Mobility USE 20-000084
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-01-07 Windward Exh C AT&T Mobility USE 20-000084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 7:44:21 AM
Creation date
2/10/2021 7:44:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
These images show AT & T's existing coverage for their network. The left image you can see <br /> that there's 4 existing towers in the general lower Puna area and the image on the right shows <br /> what coverage would look like if this tower were approved. So, you can see it mostly provides <br /> coverage to the Kam5'ili Road area and extends a little bit towards Kalapana, Seaview, and <br /> primarily the coverage would be along the Pahoa-Kalapana Road. This is a map showing the <br /> alternative sites that the Applicant looked at. There are 2 existing towers shown with the orange <br /> triangles. There's a Verizon tower in Leilani Estates and in Nanawale Estates. It's not on this <br /> map but there are some towers also in Pahoa those maybe owned by other carriers. For this <br /> particular tower site, they looked at 2 other properties one (1)property to the north and 1 <br /> property a little bit further down the highway to the south. <br /> The Planning Director is recommending approval of this permit with conditions and before I take <br /> questions, I want to address one of the issues that came up in the testimony related to Section <br /> 106 review for the Historic Preservation Act. The Applicant can go into more detail about how <br /> they completed that process but, they did do a 106 review and one of the recommendations that <br /> was made by the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) was to have an on-site archaeologist monitor <br /> any construction activities to ensure that any subsurface resources if they are encountered that <br /> they are handled correctly. So, we didn't actually looking through the conditions we didn't <br /> actually put that in but that is a condition that could be added if the Commission is open to that to <br /> have an archaeologist on-site monitoring construction activities. <br /> With that, that concludes my presentation and I'd be happy to answer any questions. <br /> CLARKSON: I have a question. <br /> REPLOGLE: Yes, Joe? <br /> CLARKSON: We recently not recently but sometime ago approved a Verizon tower along the <br /> same highway and I'm wondering where that tower would be in relation to this one? <br /> JACKSON: Okay, I'm sorry Joe. Did you say the one that was just approved in Hawaiian <br /> Paradise Park? <br /> CLARKSON: No, no, we approved one just off of Highway 130. <br /> JACKSON: Aw, okay. <br /> CLARKSON: Not maybe a year or 2 ago and I can't remember I tried to look on online maps <br /> there being no comprehensive database of cell phone towers for Hawaii County. All you could <br /> do is try and find it. I don't have the old documentation for that application. <br /> JACKSON: Okay. <br /> CLARKSON: It may have been a year or 2 ago. I should have forewarned you that I was going <br /> to wonder about this, but I just hope somebody would remember. <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.