My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-01-07 Windward Exh C AT&T Mobility USE 20-000084
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-01-07 Windward Exh C AT&T Mobility USE 20-000084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 7:44:21 AM
Creation date
2/10/2021 7:44:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
demand for expanded access to remote healthcare and improved technology is greater than ever. <br /> However, Hawaii Island lacks adequate wireless infrastructure to support these advances in <br /> healthcare island-wide. AT & T's proposed 4G LTE, 5G, FirstNet tower will provide the latest <br /> technology technological capabilities in support of several important public health and safety <br /> benefits to the community. <br /> Lastly, State Senator Joy A. San Buenaventura also submitted a letter in support of this tower on <br /> January 5, 2021. In her letter she explained that in twenty-seventeen (2017) her office conducted <br /> an informal community survey asking residents if they think homeowner associations should <br /> solicit cell tower or broadband internet towers. Two hundred ninety-two (292)responded that <br /> they were in favor of cell/broadband internet towers and with only one hundred thirty-five (135) <br /> opposed. She stated this survey is evidence that despite the vocal opposition to similar <br /> applications in the recent past, the majority of area residents are in favor of cell towers and <br /> increased connectivity. Continued investments toward the expansion of broadband infrastructure <br /> are essential for the economic development of the geographically isolated areas in our state. For <br /> many rural communities, the expansion of broadband services also facilitate improvements in <br /> emergency response capabilities, telehealth services, and quality of education. In underserved <br /> areas, the lack of broadband infrastructure has become an increasingly urgent problem, since the <br /> outbreak of COVID-19, as many measures designed to safeguard our health require reliable <br /> internet connectivity. <br /> As noted in the Conditional Use Permit(CUP) application AT & T is amenable to developing a <br /> stealth facility to accommodate the request of the adjacent property owners and other community <br /> members that have expressed concern about visual impacts. So, we would like to note that the <br /> Planning Department recommendation and conditions for approval reference various tower <br /> designs a monopole, monopine, and mono broadleaf. AT & T would like to recommend <br /> development of a monopine tower for the site as a condition of approval if the Planning <br /> Commission is going to require stealth facility and we would like to remove the references to the <br /> monopole or broadleaf to maintain consistency. <br /> It is clear that public safety will be enhanced by the Commission's approval of the application as <br /> shown in AT & T's application package. This proposed project meets all applicable <br /> requirements of Hawaii County Code for citing new wireless communication facilities and <br /> complies with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations. AT & T's proposal is also <br /> the least intrusive means of meeting its coverage objectives for this site. Accordingly, AT & T <br /> respectfully requests the Planning Commission to approve this project as proposed subject only <br /> to the County of Hawaii standard conditions of approval. <br /> In response to some of the questions brought earlier concerning Section 106 and 6E review of <br /> archaeological and historic preservation. A complete review and compliance process was <br /> completed in early to middle of 2020. This included consultation with OHA and public <br /> notification of request for comments in the local newspaper in March of 2020. The State <br /> Historic Preservation office concurred with the finding with the determination that no historic <br /> properties would be affected, and this was included in the application package of an attachment <br /> eleven (11) and the letter was dated July 2020. I'd also like to point out that as Maija indicated <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.