My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-01-19 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-01-19 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2021 3:24:11 PM
Creation date
2/11/2021 2:42:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
appropriate stocking rate of cattle – there’ve been only 3 acres worth of <br />fires – cost us about $10,000 to control those fires whereas in all the other <br />areas there’s been about 25,000 that have burned and a million dollars in <br />cost for us to fight those fires. That’s a 1% of the cost in the areas where we <br />have appropriate stocking rates of cattle. So ungulates obviously are still a <br />threat to those endangered plants and to the natural system on a whole – <br />and so the way we found on mitigating for that is to fence as much of the <br />high quality forest as we can and propose approximately 8,000 acres of <br />fences – much of that has already been built and within those fences <br />remove all ungulates – there’s about 80% of the known endangered plants <br />are found within there and then we would mitigate for any of the plants <br />outside of the fences that we would consider taken inside the fences and <br />then finally, I mean, pretty simple within the fences also control for the <br />spread of invasive weeds using manual control. Now getting to the can you <br />have your cake and eat it too? We have a very convincing, in my opinion, <br />case study of ungulates protecting the native system by grazing and keeping <br />fuel loads down but outside of those fences that are proposed like I said – <br />there’s 75,000 acres of highly degraded land that we are already considering <br />anything outside of those fences taken and lost anyways. And so that’s <br />where the question is. Can you have your cake? Can you protect the native <br />systems while also providing a perpetual and sustainable hunting program <br />of species that are a threat to that system? Unfortunately, there are no easy <br />answers and it is something that we are working on internally as an agency <br />and we will continue to hopefully make progress towards finding an answer <br />to that question. Mahalo Nui. If you have any questions you can contact me <br />from my email at the beginning of the presentation. A hui hou. <br /> <br />AA: Do any of our members have questions for Kanalu? <br /> <br />SM: Stanley from District 1. So when you talk about you fencing the areas where <br />get the most endangered stuff and trees – so the acres where don’t have – <br />that’s where – basically is where we going be able to hunt and the game be <br />in that areas? <br /> <br />KS: So when the plan was first put together, you know, twenty years ago and <br />everybody meeting together – yes, that is the idea that they’re going to <br />fence a small portion of the area with the highest quality forest – remove <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.