My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-11-13 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes 2
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
2018-11-13 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2021 2:55:00 PM
Creation date
2/11/2021 2:54:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – October 24, 2016 <br /> The geographic scope being considered is the following. So this is – it’s <br />gonna be the State of Hawaii – Pacific Islands within the Hawaii and <br />Pacific Islands National Wildlife Refuge Complex. So we’re looking at <br />Midway, Wake, Johnson – so a lot of the far outer islands that are quite a <br />ways away – those are under consideration for this. Areas that we’re <br />excluding are gonna be the Mariana Islands and Rose \[???Samoa\] and <br />that’s because we’d have to a fair bit of work to do public outreach in the <br />Marianas or in American Samoa – so it’s really focused on Hawaii areas. <br /> <br /> How can you get involved? Well the key thing I look at as a step for <br />involvement in this case is we welcome any participation – the next step of <br />the NEPA process – and that would be when we put out the draft <br />programmatic EIS for public comment. And we will be having public <br />meetings and we will be ensuring that there’s adequate time for people to <br />review the document but we really do want to have comment from people <br />on that document, but that would be the next point for public involvement <br />and at this point I think I’ve probably covered it as best I can. <br /> <br />TL: I have a couple questions on what you’ve just gone through and, um, if <br />you can, um, maybe have Dr. Siers and Mr. Chee come up with you - I <br />think, well, some of us are missing but, um... <br /> <br />EC: OK. <br /> <br />TL: ....we may have other questions and there may be questions from the <br />audience as well that, ah, as to the scope and the breadth of what you’re <br />doing. Um, on this, this programmatic impact EIS - that’s not something <br />that’s in effect right now? It’s something you’re working towards? <br /> <br />EC: Correct. It’s something we’re working towards, yes. <br /> <br />TL: OK... <br /> <br />EC: And just to clarify – four projects that are ongoing right now – they have <br />individual compliance documentation for them, so, you know, the work <br />does have compliance documentation – the key thing we want to do is <br />simplify it and we’ll have standardized compliance documentation. <br /> <br />TL: Um, in that – brings up another question is – how did this study in <br />Pohakuloa get started? Cause you say that there’s supposed to be public <br />disclosure and these sort of activities with the public before you start <br />moving into testing, ah, in these areas... <br /> <br />EC: The work at PTA is – well, I think this is little – they’re slightly different <br />things so the programmatic EIS is a different thing than this – it’s a – I <br />think the testing would be a subset that’s going to support... <br /> 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.