My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-11-13 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes 2
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
2018-11-13 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2021 2:55:00 PM
Creation date
2/11/2021 2:54:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – October 24, 2016 <br />EC: So when I look at it – I think one of the key things that I think is important <br />is having a manager weigh what is the best technique – there may be <br />situations that a manager might choose to do that – but I also think that <br />there are other tools that may be as good or may be better for certain <br />situations so I – but I do think that the dry conditions that occurred on <br />Lehua – there would be wetter conditions in forest – here – so, you know, <br />obviously there are gonna be differences if somebody were to do a <br />broadcast application. <br /> <br />NP: I was curious – how much of your, um, decision making is based on your <br />finding from, ah, Mokapu and, ah, Lehua Island experiments. <br /> <br />EC: Um... Actually, there – I think the experiences – because both of those <br />things are, are, I think, management actions where people learned <br />lessons where things went well or didn’t, I think that’s an important thing is <br />people learn things – those are gonna be incorporated in it, but I think a lot <br />of the things that are going to be in it are, are the results of studies that <br />people have done where we look at the answer – assuming people are <br />going to be concerned and with the comments we’ve got on what is the <br />risk to game or what is the risk to non-targets and one of the key things <br />over time that people have done is try to collect the data to answer those <br />questions – so that’s the type of thing that will be in the documentation <br />because I think it’s important for managers and the public to know that. <br /> <br />TL: I do – I do have just one on the game \[unclear\]. How much emphasis do <br />you give our game animals or game birds when you look at the impact to a <br />non-targeted species – which is something that, ah, Mr. Singer had <br />brought up when he came forward this evening? <br /> <br />EC: I think there’s a very heavy emphasis on it, um, in looking at the past work <br />that’s been done because there are questions and I think they’re <br />absolutely appropriate on, you know, if something’s put in the environment <br />– what is the impact to people that are taking game from, from the <br />environment so there’s been background work done on, you know, what is <br />the uptake to pigs, what, how much is carried in pigs, you know, where <br />would the – what risk is posed, so that’s a key thing that people have been <br />trying to look at the question of, you know, what is risk and I think the key <br />thing that’s important is that, that information is out because that allows a <br />manager to make the decision, again, it’s gonna be up to the individual <br />manager of what they’re gonna do but I think they need to know the pros <br />and cons of what choices they might be doing in an individual situation – <br />but there has been a fair bit of information collected on that. <br /> <br />TL: The question that I have in that regard is, you know, does the U.S. Fish & <br />Wildlife Service, you know, value the game that we have here? <br /> <br /> 14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.