My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-11-13 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes 2
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
2018-11-13 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2021 2:55:00 PM
Creation date
2/11/2021 2:54:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – October 24, 2016 <br />resources in the human environment. And it needs to take into <br />consideration impacts to cultural rights, practices and resources. As we’re <br />doing this we’re also doing parallel processes looking at cultural impacts <br />so we are doing, um, we are looking at things from a federal and state <br />perspective looking at it from cultural permitting too. <br /> <br />TL: OK. May I ask a question? <br /> <br />EC: Yeah. <br /> <br />TL: On – when you say “sound ecological principals” what exactly does that <br />mean? <br /> <br />EC: Well, I think, when I think about sound ecological principals, you know, <br />some of it is going to be looking at are we reducing the predators and <br />actually having an impact on the population. I think there’s situations <br />where you have individuals doing predator control where actually the <br />predator control has no impact. That’s a problem. The other thing is, if <br />you’re doing predator control – are you actually having a response in the <br />species that you’re trying to save. So, in, it’s in the very simplest sense, <br />you know, sound ecological principals, but, you know, we want to make <br />sure that what we’re doing is safe and effective but we shouldn’t be doing <br />it if we’re not having a positive effect on what I consider the targets which <br />are the species that are important to us. <br /> <br /> So the next thing I want to phase into is how will it accomplish rodent and <br />mongoose control and eradication. What will it do, what will it not do, what <br />methods are considered and what are the alternatives? And I think a key <br />thing that I want to comment on here is – in this we use the terms “control” <br />and “eradication.” When I look at a main Hawaiian Island case – most <br />cases we’re really looking at control of pests in an area, um, where you <br />are gonna have reinvasion and you’re gonna have to re-treat areas if there <br />isn’t a fence around it. We’ve started to have some areas for rodents and <br />mongoose where there are multi-species barriers being put up for <br />seabirds in particular. In those areas you’re not gonna have rodent and <br />mongoose re-invasion in, but I think in the most cases here, you’re looking <br />at application of things multiple times over time. The cases that I think <br />about eradication are gonna be off-shore islands, so, I think that’s a key <br />important term that people need to look at and, and, you know, that’s, for <br />instance, projects that are being considered right now are mice on <br />Midway, ah, is an example of that. So, again, I want to just cover what will <br />it do, what won’t it do – methods considered and alternatives. So what will <br />it do? And I think this, this is critical. It’s for informational and planning <br />purposes only. So what we want to do is to make sure the managers know <br />the different methods that are available to them and those methods have <br />public review. So we do want that disclosure with the public. We want to <br /> 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.