My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-04-20 Game Management Advisory Commission Mintues
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
2015-04-20 Game Management Advisory Commission Mintues
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2021 4:18:21 PM
Creation date
2/11/2021 4:18:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br /> Minutes—April 20, 2015 <br /> NA: From my perspective, and I'm gonna speak on a personal level, as a <br /> manager on this island. I have a very finite budget and I have to <br /> accomplish certain goals that are set. Some of them I set for my staff and I <br /> and others are set for me by either the policy or the direction or the <br /> initiatives that are set down. <br /> When it comes to selecting certain areas that are going to be high priority <br /> areas —either because of their uniqueness or their impactness or things <br /> that still remain — it may be habitat of a rare plant or rare birds <br /> It's the long, slow degradation of things. It might not happen today, it might <br /> right away— can somebody be there to stand watch every day to make <br /> sure that when something does come around that there's something there <br /> to protect and we can't be out there so from our perspective with the <br /> limited staff and limited funds it comes down to a cost benefit analysis or <br /> an analysis of, is this worth it? Is this something that we're supposed to be <br /> doing? <br /> NP: If you're limited by a budget, like you say, why would in Kau make fences <br /> that you know go from east to west. Why don't you just make smaller <br /> kipuka areas that are the most important areas and then that way you <br /> know there could be passage for migratory animals and hunters to go <br /> without having to get some kind of special permission and key to get in? <br /> That's a couple different questions. <br /> NA: OK. I'm not sure which Kau project you're referring to... <br /> NP: I'm just wondering why if the budget is limited why can't you just pick <br /> certain smaller areas in islands — in an island style — in a kipuka style to <br /> fence rather than making these long fences that block the migratory <br /> patterns of the game animals... <br /> TL I think what you're saying is that, you know, Willie-Joe has a — he works <br /> with that advisory committee out in Laupahoehoe and they have a fencing <br /> project now— I think it's 5,000 acres, if I'm not mistaken. But that started <br /> off as like a 50 acre deal — 500 acres possibly maybe at the most. <br /> WC: Yeah. I mean it—the goal is to get rid of them all. So to answer Nani's <br /> question —why not make small kipukas— is the goal is they don't want <br /> small kipukas they want the whole thing. <br /> NP: But if they're not budget for it... <br /> MB: Mark from Kona. Nick walk us through a process by which a potential <br /> NABS area is identified through the decision of we're gonna fence and <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.