2015-04-20 Game Management Advisory Commission Mintues

Home

Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes--April 20, 2015 be addressed and then have our county council look at it good —with the advisement that we all agree that this is something good. And then from there have PONC realize that this is one of the prioritized list that should be prioritized in a high format—and have it looked at accordingly. Because it comes from our commission, it comes from PONC commission —that, yeah, it was addressed in a proper way. So even if I get somebody for propose something but with the GMAC approval of recommendation from GMAC saying that yeah, we would like to see some kind of access like this be put up. Wouldn't that be prioritized on the list and brought up, because now I think we'd get that much power, right, to say, under advisement from GMAC that we all agreed and put it to a vote that this is something that we should be addressing, right? That's generally what we can do, right, I mean, being that we don't have that much, right, we're volunteers, as you said. But I think as a quorum I think we get that power to say and recommend. CM: Kalani, you're more eloquent than me. That's what I was trying to say. I defer to you. HV: I think we're missing the point here is that— bottom line is somebody or some group needs to prepare and submit an application. According to Craig. But if you have members or if there's somebody on —that you work with that can go through the application process and submit it in the application that GMAC supports this property—then it's gonna go before the PONC commission and it should carry some weight. AK: I'm sure in each of your respective council districts you must have community groups that might even champion these properties so that's another thought to consider. HV: The flip side it would be if somebody came and submitted an application to GMAC and said that PONC advised us that we're going in the right directions— same type of scenario. How would you guys view — how would you as a body view that information. Would it matter, would it carry more weight as a presented subject? So that's the same criteria that our commission would face as well. But bottom line — application — provide supporting evidence and if the application is solid it has merit. Then the commission's gonna take a hard look at it. TL When you say supporting evidence you're talking about recommendations from our committee or others or financing options that area available— that kind of stuff? HV: Talking more about information related to the property—what is its significance? It's not just metes and bounds—there's more to it— and its' all part of the application,