My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-12-17 Leeward Exh B (AMEND SMA 388)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-12-17 Leeward Exh B (AMEND SMA 388)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2021 3:50:31 PM
Creation date
2/18/2021 3:50:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
to the Planning Department, based on recommendations from a professional security company, <br /> which would be best practices, as opposed to us just try to react to every, you know, on a <br /> case-by-case basis. I hope that answers your question <br /> VAN PERNIS: But you are not dealing with the problem now. <br /> YOSHIMOTO: I think Chair - - - <br /> CARR <br /> - -CARR SMITH: There are many - - - forward, Mark. Okay, any more questions <br /> VAN PERNIS: Let me ask, will you commit to a date by which the existing concrete <br /> monstrosity will be demolished? <br /> FUKE: I think that, as I mentioned earlier, like the current plan that was approved, the 2017 plan <br /> that was approved, call for the retention of the partially completed structure, and moving forward <br /> I think what the value engineering, you know, consultant is trying to do is like to seek the <br /> appropriateness of retaining it or modifying it, and, you know,pursuant to a similar or like a <br /> modified design. So at this point in time it would be premature for the developer, you know, to <br /> affirmatively state that that structure will be removed or destroyed, because if it can be salvaged <br /> and incorporated into a design that's generally pursuant to the 2017 plan approval, they'll <br /> proceed and retain it. <br /> CARR SMITH: Very good, thank you <br /> VAN PERNIS: Regardless of the legal maze of these, will the owner volunteer to conduct a <br /> traffic study after 22, 23 plus five years, regardless of whether he technically was required to do <br /> so then - - - <br /> CARR SMITH: Sid? <br /> FUKE: Yeah, I'm sorry I didn't quite understand the question, Mark. <br /> CARR SMITH: He wants you to commit to a traffic study. <br /> VAN PERNIS: Regardless of the legal maze <br /> CARR SMITH: He's asking you if you will. <br /> FUKE: No, I don't think that the applicant can make the commitment right now. You know, <br /> there are like mitigation requirements in accordance with the staff's recommendation, I mean, <br /> improving that portion of Walua Road and Alii Drive fronting, you know, the subject property, <br /> but over and beyond that, having a traffic studyI don't know, I,personally, I would not <br /> recommend that the applicant make that commitment. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you, Sid. Max <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.