|
FUKE: - - -
<br /> CARR
<br /> - -CARR SMITH: Can't hear you, Sid.
<br /> FUKE: Okay, I'm sorry
<br /> CARR SMITH: There you go.
<br /> FUKE: muted. Yeah, in response to Commissioner Vitousek's question, I think two things.
<br /> One is like, you know, on the straight condemnation issue, it doesn't preclude like the public or
<br /> whoever, government agency, you know, to make a request of the public access open, you know,
<br /> the PASH, open space access commission, and see if this can be on their list. And, you know,
<br /> that's, that's a long process. And if at some point in time whether wherever the developer is, you
<br /> know, relative to its development plans, if the Commission decides that this property should be
<br /> acquired for the public good, for open space, whatever have you, then they'll go ahead and, you
<br /> know, do the appropriate condemnation process and eventually acquire the property.
<br /> The other point about like in terms of your timetable, as you were speaking, then I kind of like
<br /> adjusted the dates; I think that, and especially since Mr. Oleck has given us the liberty to make
<br /> any internal adjustments, we feel like that that's reasonable. And I think what—now hearing
<br /> your comment I think what could be reasonable would be to have like plan approval no later
<br /> than January 30, 2022, as opposed to March, and building permits submitted no later than
<br /> January 30, 2023, as opposed to June, and so if you assume like a one-year review approval
<br /> process of the building permit in 2023, then you can start construction no later than January 30,
<br /> 2024, essentially giving you almost like two years for the construction period.
<br /> CARR SMITH: Sounds good. Thank you, Sid, thanks for that clarification. Barbara, go ahead.
<br /> DEFRANCO: Anyway, I thank you, Mike, Mr. Vitousek, for all of your input. I agree with you,
<br /> and I agree with Sid, that we have to find something that is actually achievable. And when I read
<br /> the timeline, I didn't think the timeline that they offered us was real. So I like that we are
<br /> adjusting this timeline so that we can make this project work. Thank you.
<br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you, Barbara. Go ahead, Mark.
<br /> VAN PERNIS: Can you hear me?
<br /> CARR SMITH: Yes.
<br /> VAN PERNIS: Mr. Fuke, is the developer willing to commit to immediate building of an
<br /> inexpensive temporary asphalt sidewalk on Kahakai and Alii to alleviate the increased
<br /> pedestrian traffic there?
<br /> FUKE: As I mentioned earlier like, you know, I, again, it's unfortunate Mr. Oleck is not here,
<br /> but, you know, I'm not at liberty or neither is, I think, Ms. Yoshimoto or Mr. Oue can make that
<br /> 20
<br /> EXHIBIT B
<br />
|