Laserfiche WebLink
CARR SMITH: Now we've got your desktop. <br /> DARROW: Give me one sec. I don't know what just happened. <br /> CARR SMITH: No problem. <br /> DARROW: Earlier Rachelle had the blue screen of death, now I have the black screen of death. <br /> Okay, let's see. Can you see that now? <br /> CARR SMITH: Yes. <br /> DARROW: Okay. Let's hope this stops. Stop, stop, stop. Okay, I can go back. Alright, so, what <br /> we're, what we're suggesting is to include the criteria that we used in the administrative time <br /> conditions into our rules. That's the examples. These are either criteria or findings. So then <br /> again, we could, you know, say you need to re-evaluate the entire project again, but this kind of <br /> summarizes everything into these two statements. And then we can incorporate language that <br /> helps us to re-evaluate based on Section 106 and the HAR language so we can try to incorporate <br /> language into the amendment that addresses those scopes that were identified in that. Size, scope, <br /> intensity, use, location, and or timing. Additionally, we were thinking that we should add in the <br /> ability for the commission, which would most likely be the Department on behalf of the <br /> commission, when these come in and we see a change to the intensity of the project that we <br /> request a possibly a traffic, a traffic study, or a, maybe an archaeological inventory survey if <br /> recommended by SHPD, or any other type of report that may be needed to provide clarity as to <br /> the changes in the project. And then lastly, I think one thing that is really important is to really be <br /> clear that the applicant provides a specific update of everything that has happened from the <br /> original time of approval till that date, whether there has been any activity, and if there has, what <br /> has that been. If there hasn't, then they basically say nothing's happened on the property for, <br /> during that period of time. And then again, any other considerations by the commission that we <br /> can consider in the amendment. <br /> CARR SMITH: Excellent. Thanks, Jeff. Go ahead Mike. <br /> VITOUSEK: Sure. Some, some language that I was kind of working on is, if an applicant <br /> requests a change in the proposed development, including but not limited to, an extension of time <br /> periods or other conditions required by the permit's approval, the commission or the Director <br /> shall consider the extent to which the proposed action has changed in size, scope, intensity, use, <br /> location, or timing, among other things, and or whether there have been changes in the <br /> environment and or community where the project is located such that the impact of the project <br /> would be substantially different from the potential impacts at the time the permit was initially <br /> approved. <br /> DARROW: Very good. <br /> 4 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />