My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-12-17 Leeward Exh D (Discussion re permit extension)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-12-17 Leeward Exh D (Discussion re permit extension)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2021 3:52:39 PM
Creation date
2/18/2021 3:52:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
into account when re-evaluating this project. So, that's the intention of what, what I was talking <br /> about. <br /> CARR SMITH: Yeah, yeah. Well, thank you for working with Jeff on this. Commissioner Van <br /> Pernis, do you have something new, or? <br /> VAN PERNIS: I wanted to respond to Barbara, Barbara's comments, which are it's the <br /> applicant's responsibility to inform us of everything that should be considered. Their investment <br /> or whatever. We shouldn't have to guess; we shouldn't have to wonder. In Mike's presentation <br /> on this is not about time, they can get as many extensions as allowed, as long as the Planning <br /> Commission can impose appropriate conditions rather than having a development approved in <br /> 1990, built in 2025 with no additional conditions or changes and the result being that the <br /> population, the public pays for the problems that the developer is creating by his delay. It's only <br /> fair, it's only good planning and other jurisdictions do it that way and I don't know why we <br /> shouldn't. <br /> CARR SMITH: That's what we're working on. Okay, very good. Thank you all, appreciate your <br /> efforts on this. Thank you. <br /> DARROW: If I could just <br /> CARR SMITH: Yeah. <br /> DARROW: --say something in summary, is that I'm not sure which commissioner it was that <br /> mentioned this, but might have been Commissioner Vitousek, the, you know, amendments take a <br /> while, rule changes take some time and stuff, but in the meantime, there is the option to add the <br /> conditions in the permit of what the commission wants to see. So, if the commission wants to see <br /> those, those review of effects that have, that come out we can put a condition in there or try to <br /> word a condition that we can start adding in there that if these things happen, we need to re- <br /> review. Additionally, I've seen in the past where there's been sunset time on the permits. It'll say <br /> the period of time for this, the life of the permit is ten years, that's it. They have to come back, <br /> but basically it's, I've seen one that actually, there was a number of permits that were issued that <br /> said that the life of this permit is ten years, but the intention was that they wanted them to <br /> relocate to an area that was more zoned appropriately like an industrial area, but there weren't <br /> any available during that time, but it appeared that in time there would be areas available for <br /> zoning that they could move to. So, these kind of conditions the commission has, has gotten <br /> creative and added in. They're not just standardized conditions. So again, until those changes <br /> occur, there's always those options available. <br /> CARR SMITH: Right. Good. <br /> KEALOHA: I have a quick follow up on that, you know, as opposed to sunset, a notion that <br /> entitlements or permits can be assigned, because I agree, with Mr. Van Pernis that some <br /> developers will seek the entitlements just so they can improve the value of their property for sale. <br /> And if you eliminate that opportunity, then they'll be incentivized to finish the project through so <br /> 8 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.