Laserfiche WebLink
7. examine local laws, procedures, and practices with regard to tax policy and administration with regard to their comparison to IAAO Standards (Sections 2 <br /> through 12). In terms of analyzing these components, findings are to: <br /> a. Render an opinion and offer recommendations as to the local property tax assessment processes and procedures. <br /> b. Summarize the current local situation with regard to adherence to and utilization <br /> of exemptions and compare to other jurisdictions. Make recommendations to the <br /> County as to whether the laws currently in place can reasonably be enforced and <br /> how those laws compare and contrast with similar laws elsewhere. If appropriate, <br /> suggest changes in practices, procedures, and/or legislation that might help to resolve impracticalities. <br /> c. Report on local staffing adequacy relative to jurisdiction size and valuation complexity. <br /> Using IAAO Standards as a guide, make recommendations regarding <br /> whether the staff size is adequate to maintain the property tax system currently in <br /> place. <br /> d. Offer other information and analysis of common jurisdictional ad valorem property <br /> tax law and the comparison of the norm to the rules and procedures in place in Hawai'i. <br /> 1.3 Limitations <br /> The report and its findings are limited to information learned in the course of interviews, <br /> a review of pertinent material provided by the County, and a review and comparison with <br /> pertinent IAAO literature and contextual information based on the experience of the authors. <br /> There was no attempt to audit assessment records for accuracy or to perform independent <br /> ratio studies, sales verification, or other performance evaluation procedures. In <br /> addition, the report does not attempt to critique individual staff and management performance <br /> mance. Where we feel that current practices may have lead to less than optimal assessments <br /> or assessment equity, observations and recommendations are provided. <br /> 1.4 Methodology of the Project <br /> To conduct this review, the County of Hawai'i retained the International Association of <br /> Assessing Officers (IAAO). The IAAO organized a team of experts, including Alan <br /> Dornfest, AAS and Richard Almy, both of whom have extensive experience reviewing <br /> property tax policies and assessment administration systems throughout the U.S. The report <br /> was reviewed by Jeffery Spelman, CAE. Mr. Dornfest and Mr. Almy, who are the <br /> primary authors of this report, met with the Finance Director, attorneys from the Office of <br /> the Corporation Counsel, staff of the Department of Finance Real Property Tax Division, <br /> the Managing Director, whose office oversees the Department of Finance, a Council <br /> member, an aide to another Council member, and several citizen / stakeholders. Meetings <br /> were held on site, mostly in the Hilo or Kona areas, during the week of November <br /> 14, 2011. Additional meetings were held via conference call prior to the on-site visit with <br /> the Legislative Auditor, who facilitated scheduling all the meetings. The Legislative Auditor <br /> 3 <br />