2021-02-04 Windward Exh B Kirpal Meditation and Ecological Center SPP-20-000220

Home

REPLOGLE: Are your interest clearly distinguishable from the general public or government agencies whose jurisdiction includes the land involved. So, are you separate from all that and that they have some property interest in the land or lawfully you don't live on his land but. — DICKIE CLARK: No, I live on my land. REPLOGLE: — even though they do not have an interest different from the public generally, the proposed action will cause them this may be where you come in will cause them actual or threatened injury in fact. DICKIE CLARK: It depends on how you define injury doesn't it? REPLOGLE: If they had an open outhouse right on your boundary that could cause you injury. DICKIE CLARK: Well to my knowledge they have a cesspool of some sort on the setback on our mutual setback, 2 in fact. In addition to other buildings in my setback or in our setback and his actually encroached another building number twenty-one (21) actually encroaches on my property. REPLOGLE: Okay, that's what we're talking about. DICKIE CLARK: In addition, there is noise that comes from his operation of his business shall we say. REPLOGLE: Okay. CLARKSON: Mr. Chair? REPLOGLE: You're on the right track ma'am, if there is anything else let us know and then will continue. CLARKSON: Mr. Chair? REPLOGLE: Yes, excuse me Commissioner Clarkson? CLARKSON: Yes, I just have a question for Counsel, Ms. Hall? HALL: Yes. CLARKSON: I just wanted to ask whether being an immediate neighbor of an Applicant and a contiguous parcel is almost always by definition an interest is clearly distinguishable that of the general public? HALL: I think that's to the discretion of the Commission but, I will say that in many prior cases that has been what the Commission has found but, again it's up to you guys if you feel like that separates her from the general public or not and allows her to have standing. EXHIBIT B 4