Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: Yes <br /> KERN: In addition to (indiscernible–echo)robust modeling how this wall will affect the beach <br /> over the course of 30, 40, 50, 60 years. That's the same methodology that they use on other <br /> islands for projects of similar nature. So just want to really have the best understanding that we <br /> possibly can. <br /> CARR SMITH: Zendo, can you repeat that? Because (indiscernible–echo) <br /> KERN: Yeah, some type of robust modeling by an engi there's engineering firms that deal <br /> with this that actually bring multiple-disciplinary folks together to actually create a modeling <br /> over the years of wave action, sea level rise, walls, flanking, etcetera, and that would take into <br /> account the walls to the south, to the north, this current wall, as well as the projections of sea <br /> level rise. And, to me, that along with the alternatives analysis—now, if the alternatives analysis <br /> came back and said we are doing vegetation, that's a different story; if it comes back and says we <br /> are doing the wall, which will eventually turn into shoreline hardening, having an understanding <br /> of the modeling behind that would be the proper methodology to do that. <br /> VITOUSEK: Just to add—Commissioner Van Pernis, this is Commissioner Carr Smith's time to <br /> ask questions, and then, you know, we will give opportunity for discussion after a motion has <br /> been made. Commissioner Carr Smith, please proceed. <br /> CARR SMITH: Yeah, I was just trying to get clarity. I think I understand(echo continued) <br /> mm, never mind, no, I'm good. <br /> VITOUSEK: Did you have further response, Mr. Pieri, to the question? <br /> PIERL Yes, but it's kind of roundabout. Can you repeat the question itself? I got sidelined <br /> when Alex was saying things that weren't true. The Kona Reef has let people use that area for <br /> 40 years. There is a shoreline setback variance, and in that variance a settlement agreement <br /> states that there is a 10-foot easement along the full length of the property that people use. There <br /> is also a statement that they would maintain it, as long as the Kona Reef was in existence, for the <br /> benefit of the public. So (inaudible–loss of sound connection) kind of thing there, you know, <br /> how could we possibly take away this after 40 years? <br /> The other thing is Alex mentioned, you know, planting naupaka, etcetera, etcetera. Zendo Kern, <br /> Director Kern, was there, he saw that there were only two places on the southern end of the, in <br /> the area that we want to build the structure, that the ocean was even accessible. The other areas <br /> had naupaka and other plants already in place. So to say that we should put naupaka, etcetera, <br /> you know, the alternative, that stuff is already there. A site visit would show, you know, what's <br /> there and what's not there. <br /> CARR SMITH: Mr. Pieri <br /> 18 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />