Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: Yep. <br /> ROY: In the interim the applicant will work to determine the feasibility to convert the cesspool <br /> to an appropriate upgraded septic system within the space provided all within five years of final <br /> approval of this Use Permit. <br /> VITOUSEK: The one change I would have in that second one is I would say the applicant will <br /> convert the cesspool to a septic within five years, and then "if feasible, given the constraints of <br /> the lot and the existing structures." <br /> ROY: Yeah, we'll say "shall?" <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, yeah. <br /> CARR SMITH: Hey, Alex, I'm a stickler for words, so one more time,please. <br /> ROY: Okay pardon me while I make sure. <br /> CARR SMITH: Yeah. <br /> ROY: The applicant will contribute, will make a fair share contribution to an applicable sewer <br /> district if and when one is formed that serves the property. The applicant shall convert the <br /> existing cesspool to an appropriate septic system within five years of the approval of this use, if <br /> determined feasible and within, available, within the space provided by the parcel's dimension or <br /> setbacksI'm not sure how you want to say that. <br /> VITOUSEK: Let's go with the, I think that"if determined feasible considering the limitations of <br /> the lot and its existing structures." <br /> ROY: Okay. Is that good, Commissioner Carr Smith? <br /> CARR SMITH: I think so. Did the applicant have something to say about that? John? <br /> PIPAN: Yeah, I think, I think that sounds good just so long as we keep in mind that the <br /> limitations of the property would include the shoreline setback. <br /> ROY: Yes, definitely, and the, and of course this would all require SMA review and approval. <br /> PIPAN: Of course. <br /> ROY: Yap. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, Commissioner Carr Smith, can you confirm that this language can be added <br /> to the existing motion? <br /> 20 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />